The environmental issues are too complex to be handle by the individual.
Nowadays, society develop more and more fast, and we ignored one of the most important problem-environmental issues. Only civilians cannot solve this issues by themselves, government and authorities should participate also. In my opinion, i totally agree with the environmental issues are too complex to be handle by the individual.
First of all, follow the air pollution become worse, there are haze in most of country which is developing or advance country.For instance, in my country, there are really seriously haze in the northeast of my country, and this situation was caused by factories release too many pollutions, and people who live in the city have to wear the mask every single day, otherwise they will get sick such as cold or fever even bronchitis easily. To purify the haze, civilian could do nothing on it, government have to use the technologies from expert such as use electricity car to reduce the pollution from normal cars , and making a lot of clean energy such as government appeal to use the sun electricity to decrease the amount of pollution per year. On the other way, country leader announce the factory limited sewage discharge also can reduce the haze density. Only the individuals cannot really solve the air pollution, unless authority and government participate also.
Secondly, to improve the environment, the basic things is to garbage classification. But only civilian could not do the best in the way of classify, because they do not know how to reprocessing the product or decompose the garbage. The authority is a important role for classification and reprocessing the garbage. In Japan, government require people to separate the plastic, can, paper, cardboard , and even they need to separate the cap from the bottle. The authorities gets the recycle garbage to the factories and produce the product that can reuse.
To sum up, people could do recycle to help the environment reduce the energy waste, but if people do not have authorities or factories. Those garbage will leave alone and corrode outside forever.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ment and authorities should participate also. In my opinion, i totally agree with th...
^^^^
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
... which is developing or advance country.For instance, in my country, there are real...
^^^
Line 2, column 611, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...to reduce the pollution from normal cars , and making a lot of clean energy such a...
^^
Line 2, column 963, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ss authority and government participate also. Secondly, to improve the environment,...
^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...decompose the garbage. The authority is a important role for classification and r...
^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...arate the plastic, can, paper, cardboard , and even they need to separate the cap ...
^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'get'.
Suggestion: get
...he cap from the bottle. The authorities gets the recycle garbage to the factories an...
^^^^
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this garbage' or 'Those garbages'?
Suggestion: This garbage; Those garbages
...e do not have authorities or factories. Those garbage will leave alone and corrode outside fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, for instance, such as, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.125 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94440390788 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556547619048 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 98.2472931548 48.9658058833 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 123.0 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137681648121 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611181713797 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163688755861 0.0737576698707 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10822263252 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.165671329772 0.0645574589148 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.