Which of the following would you change to improve your health 1 The kind of food you eat 2 The amount of exercise 3 The amount of stress

Essay topics:

Which of the following would you change to improve your health: 1. The kind of food you eat 2. The amount of exercise 3. The amount of stress?

In the complex world, there are many ways can cause people unhealth, like the amount of stress, the amount of exercise and the kind of food you eat. Which way do you think if you change it, it can improve your health. From my point of view, I think that it is a good way to keep my health if I change the amount of stress.

First and foremost, a lot of stress can cause people sleepless. That’s mean people can’t have enough energy for next day. According to the research, human should have at least 8 hours sleep per day. If people don’t satisfy with this condition, it will make people concentrate less their work or study. Also staying up late is harmful for human body. It is a best way for people’s organ to take break at night. If people reduce some stress, they can have a good night sleep. Also it can keep their health, and in the same way citizens can keep a good mood and work more efficient.

Furthermore, the amount of the stress can make people forget to eat at the regular time. As you know, in the modern society, dwellers have a lot of pressure from peer. Even it is lunch time, people still are typing or making the formats. Thus they miss the regular eating time. It leads them have a bad eating pattern. If people don’t have enough nutrition in their body, it is harmful for their stomach. When people choose the put away their works at the lunch times, they can keep their body heathier.

Admittedly, people also should change what they are eating right now, because a lot of fast food are unhealth. If they change their diet to home-made food, their body will be stronger than before. Also it can help them get enough energy to strive for better outcomes.

Votes
Average: 3.5 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...e concentrate less their work or study. Also staying up late is harmful for human bo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...p late is harmful for human body. It is a best way for people's organ to tak...
^
Line 3, column 495, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ress, they can have a good night sleep. Also it can keep their health, and in the sa...
^^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...still are typing or making the formats. Thus they miss the regular eating time. It l...
^^^^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...heir body will be stronger than before. Also it can help them get enough energy to s...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, still, thus, well, at least, i think, kind of, you know, in the same way

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 312.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49358974359 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21097168508 2.67179642975 83% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519230769231 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 618.680645161 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.5649987482 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.7619047619 100.406767564 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8571428571 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04761904762 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225079902527 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735573018292 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113559073463 0.0737576698707 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181811162821 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.195960758044 0.0645574589148 304% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.1 11.7677419355 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 58.1214874552 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.1575268817 51% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.17 10.9000537634 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.61 8.01818996416 82% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 86.8835125448 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.