There is a controversy on how universities should spend the money to improve the quality of education. Some groups of people may hold the view that universities should increase professor's wages. However, some other groups may hold a different view and feel that the money should be spent on improving universities facilities. From my vantage point, I concur with the latter point for the reasons I address in this essay.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that professors can earn money not only from universities but also from other external parties. In fact, companies are very generous to give awards to professors who are willing to work on their own projects. A vivid example to illustrate my view point are the awards that university doctors receive on the research they conduct on some new drugs for companies. such kind of research doctors do charge for it. As result, they have additional income from the other work they do.
Having this mind, universities can spend the extra money they have on university facilities like libraries, lecturer halls, and computers. These are few example of the things universities need to enhance the quality of education they offer to students. for instance, libraries need to be equipped with computers for students to submit their reports. Without the availability of such computers, students would no be able of submit their reports on time. Besides, instead of spending the money on professor's wages, universities can spend money on building more classrooms, so universities can accept more new enrollment students
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no means the only reasons available. In fact, there is another subtle reason. The noteworthy, refreshing, intelligible results of the a study that was published in the American education Journal which showed that universities paying higher professor's wages often have limited budget to spend on other facilities. This eventually causes a disruption of the quality of education universities offer to students.
To wrap up, contemplating the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that professors do earn extra money external parties. Thus, universities in this situation may have an opportunity to spend the money on library equipment's, lecture halls and so on.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 407, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...onduct on some new drugs for companies. such kind of research doctors do charge for ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 523, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nal income from the other work they do. Having this mind, universities can spend...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun example seems to be countable; consider using: 'few examples'.
Suggestion: few examples
...ecturer halls, and computers. These are few example of the things universities need to enha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 254, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ty of education they offer to students. for instance, libraries need to be equipped...
^^^
Line 4, column 410, Rule ID: NOW[3]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ility of such computers, students would no be able of submit their reports on time...
^^
Line 6, column 223, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...hy, refreshing, intelligible results of the a study that was published in the America...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 488, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... quality of education universities offer to students. To wrap up, contemplatin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, so, thus, for instance, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1969.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27882037534 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93231903482 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501340482574 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4095602145 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.631578947 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6315789474 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47368421053 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231219344112 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805264287961 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769753069991 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137077696209 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672945500419 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.