The article and the lecture both discuss pterosaurs capabability of flying. The author claims that the weight of this huge bird make him extremely not capable of flying. The lecturer, however, refutes the author's claims and provide three reasons to support.
The first allegation of the script against which the author argues is that these reptiles cannot fly because do not enough energy to fly. However, the lecturer disputes this point by claiming that because these animals have feathers, they are considered similar to the warm blooded animals. In other words, they have high metabolic rate. and are capable of producing energy. Thus, This energy help them to lift their body off the ground
Secondly, according to the text these reptiles are large in weight therefore they cannot fly.The lecturer find this idea debatable. He agrees that these animals are large in size, however, he states that they are relatively light in comparison to their size. According to the lecturer what makes these animals fly is their hollow bone which makes them lighter than other birds.
Finally, the author claims that the reptiles have weak back limbs and cannot lift their body off the ground. Again the lecturer disagree with the author's opinion by stating that these animals do not use only their back limbs to fly, instead they use all their four limbs. He contends, that by using all four limbs, they can go fast enough to push themselves up and fly,
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ke him extremely not capable of flying. The lecturer, however, refutes the authors ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nd provide three reasons to support. The first allegation of the script against ...
^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...r words, they have high metabolic rate. and are capable of producing energy. Thus, ...
^^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: large
...ccording to the text these reptiles are large in weight therefore they cannot fly.The lecturer ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...rge in weight therefore they cannot fly.The lecturer find this idea debatable. He a...
^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'finds'.
Suggestion: finds
... therefore they cannot fly.The lecturer find this idea debatable. He agrees that the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: large
...table. He agrees that these animals are large in size, however, he states that they are relat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...d. Again the lecturer disagree with the authors opinion by stating that these animals d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00411522634 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17928337418 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526748971193 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5892609325 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5384615385 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.00937152880441 0.272083759551 3% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0059853033533 0.0996497079465 6% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0207336990132 0.0662205650399 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00870264573099 0.162205337803 5% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150734245663 0.0443174109184 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.