The lecturer disputes the author's suggested theory that the extreme conditions on Venus makes life impossible on this planet. He provides several reasons to cast doubt about the author's claims.
First, according to the lecturer the high atmospheric pressure on Venus causes spaceships to be destroyed upon landing. However, the lecturer finds this idea debatable. He contends that spaceships could be established floating on this planet. He contends that Theoretically speaking a station could be established floating on the surface of this planet because the atmospheric pressure on higher altitude is far much lower than that on the surface.
Second, the lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that since no water or oxygen exist on the surface of Venus, astronauts have to bring these essential components from earth. The lecturer however argues that because nitrogen and sulfur dioxide are available on the surface of this planet, it is possible to produce these essential life components from these chemicals without having the need to import them from earth.
Finally, the author argues that life on Venus is not possible because no enough sunlight reaches this planets. However, the lecturer refute these claims. He states that sunshine may penetrate the thin clouds layer. Moreover, some more sunlight could be provided from the cloud's sunshine reflections
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ible because no enough sunlight reaches this planets. However, the lecturer refute t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'clouds'' or 'cloud's'?
Suggestion: clouds'; cloud's
...ore sunlight could be provided from the clouds sunshine reflections
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46261682243 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60089025118 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546728971963 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 62.7722404146 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4166666667 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8333333333 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0928416594181 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381125060223 0.0996497079465 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386189608076 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0572341475638 0.162205337803 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288595301748 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.