The article and the lecture both discuss pterosaurs capability of flying, an ancient winged animal that lived with dinosaurs. The author claims that such birds are unable of fly. The lecturer, however, refutes the author's claims and provide three reasons to support his opinion.
The first allegation of the script against which the author argues is that pterosaurs cannot fly because they are considered cold blooded animals. However, the lecturer disputes this point by claiming that because these animals have feathers, they are considered similar to the warm blooded animals. In other words, they have high metabolic rate. and are capable of producing energy. This energy facilitate flying for a longer period of time
Secondly, according to the text pterosaurs are not capable of flying because they have high weight.The lecturer find this idea debatable. He agrees that these animals are large in size, however, he states that they are relatively light in comparison to their size. According to the lecturer what makes these animals fly is their hollow bone which makes them lighter than what they look.
Finally, the author claims that pterosaurs have weak back limbs which makes them not able to fly. Again the lecturer disagree with the author's opinion by stating that these animals do not use only their back limbs to fly, instead they use all their four limbs. He contends, that by using their four limbs, they can easily lift their body off the ground because they can have extra strength to fly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...aims that such birds are unable of fly. The lecturer, however, refutes the authors ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hree reasons to support his opinion. The first allegation of the script against ...
^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...r words, they have high metabolic rate. and are capable of producing energy. This e...
^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s energy facilitate flying for a longer period of time Secondly, according to the text pter...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...of flying because they have high weight.The lecturer find this idea debatable. He ...
^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cause they have high weight.The lecturer find this idea debatable. He agrees that...
^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'finds'.
Suggestion: finds
...use they have high weight.The lecturer find this idea debatable. He agrees that the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: large
...table. He agrees that these animals are large in size, however, he states that they are relat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...y. Again the lecturer disagree with the authors opinion by stating that these animals d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1269.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09638554217 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22203431408 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538152610442 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2798280594 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6153846154 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0701652592065 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031092121619 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692629260189 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0558665302831 0.162205337803 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585180768181 0.0443174109184 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.