The lecturer disputes the author's assumptions that it is impossible to maintain human presence on Venus. He provides three concrete reasons to cast doubt about the author's claims.
First, according to the lecturer a spaceship cannot land on Venus because the atmospheric pressure on this planet's surface is much higher than the earth. However, the lecturer finds this idea debatable. He contends that a space ship does not need to land on this planet. Instead, a floating station can be established which enables the spaceship not to crash.
Second, the lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that since water and oxygen are not available on this planet, life may not exist. He points out that life on this planet can exist inspite the scarce of those elements because oxygen and water can produced on the space from nitrogen and sulfuric dioxide.
Finally, the author claims that there is no enough sunshine on Venus to support life because very limited amount of light can penetrate the clouds. However,, the lecturer refutes these claims. He argues that because of the thin clouds, light may be able to penetrate. Moreover, some light reflection may also provide energy to the spaceship.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive commas
Suggestion: ,
... light can penetrate the clouds. However,, the lecturer refutes these claims. He ...
^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trate the clouds. However,, the lecturer refutes these claims. He argues that bec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 1373.03311258 74% => OK
No of words: 198.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10606060606 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45009885297 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 419.366225166 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7588979207 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.25 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0874337914012 0.272083759551 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365049814769 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666024315803 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0605530844876 0.162205337803 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541694844467 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.