University is crucial for education as well as society. It is where we learn the most important lesson of our life. And the key points of a university are professors. So, to improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. And I support that for some reasons.
The main reason to support the statement that it helps the professor to spend more fund of research. If a professor gets more salaries, he can keep more research student on his laboratory by giving personal fund. For example, in my previous university, one of my professors was working on a research project but he could not able to finish this because of the dearth of the fund. But after the next couple of years when he is getting more salaries, he continues the research by keeping two research assistants. As we can see, the professor wouldn't able to complete his research if he didn't get more salaries.
Another reason is that more salaries will motivate professors to spend more time with students in the universities to strong their understanding and make better education environment. Many professors who go to another university to take a class for extra money. Because of low salaries, they have to do some other thing to earn more money. Otherwise, it might be tough for them to manage family and research expenditure. For instance, I saw in my university, most of the professor used to go to some private universities to take an extra class for the money. For this reason, they weren't available at the university on some weekdays. As a result, they can't spend enough time with students of both universities. This experience taught me that more salaries will help professors to spent some qualities time with their student to make better understanding which help to improve education quality.
In sum, though some may oppose spending more money on salaries of university professors, it will be great to improve education quality, research opportunities. Professors will spend more fund on research and improve the environment for better education by spending time with the student. Every professor should get the highest possible money for their salary for building a better place for education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'salaries'' or 'salary's'?
Suggestion: salaries'; salary's
...ion, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. And I support th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ssistants. As we can see, the professor wouldnt able to complete his research if he did...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 585, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...dnt able to complete his research if he didnt get more salaries. Another reason is...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 582, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...ss for the money. For this reason, they werent available at the university on some wee...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 653, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ity on some weekdays. As a result, they cant spend enough time with students of both...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03243243243 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84271909669 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464864864865 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.0 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2717694724 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.619047619 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52380952381 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198150474105 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849530992255 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988788237323 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165757429107 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100323127258 0.0645574589148 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.