In today's turbulent economic situation, government should cautiously decide how to use its limited budget. Some people are in favor of supporting arts, while others believe athletics are more reasonable. It's hard to judge which has more significance. In my perspective, I prefer the first one, for the following reasons:
First of all, governmental funds are regarded as vital to help individuals show more passion in traditional art forms. With the improvement of technology, nowadays people have a tendency to focus on modern art forms such as pop music rather than legacies of our ancestors. If financial assistance arrives, more cultural heritage exhibitions will be held to attract people’s attention. As a consequence, it might regain popularity among the masses.
Furthermore, not only are arts funds help preserve traditional art forms, they are also beneficial to tourism. It should be abundantly clear that investing in arts yields great profits for all parties involved. This phenomenon can be greatly attributed to the fact that quite a few tourists will be appealed to this government-sponsored art projects. In other words, these tourists who are interested in arts will spend a large amount of money on museum, film and other art forms, which eventually increase millions of dollars in state revenue. On the contrary, countries that do not sponsor arts are always the ones that struggle to draw tourists attention.
Last but not least, arts can also represent a nations’ culture and character. For instance, almost everything we recognize about ancient China comes from their architecture, paintings, poetry and so on. The same goes for other countries. If governments want people to remember and respect their nation, they ought to take more significant interest in supporting arts.
In a nutshell, arts bring in traditional protection, national revenue and documents history. Judging from all the above mentioned situations, we may reach the conclusion that governments ought to emphasize arts over athletics.
- Do you agree with the following statement? People often buy products not becausethey need them but because other people have them. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 95
- Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 85
- 53)Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important aspect of a job is the money a person earns. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for instance, such as, first of all, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46372239748 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07265560566 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649842271293 0.524837075471 124% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3708014169 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2222222222 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273409742177 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674678679144 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469985286446 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123410278038 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387673618776 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.