Humans will reduce the usage of fossil fuels in next 20 years

Essay topics:

Humans will reduce the usage of fossil fuels in next 20 years.

When it comes to the usage of fossil fuels for the next twenty years, there are some people who believe usage will increase while there are some who believe usage will decrease, personally, I believe that the usage of fossil fuels will reduce in the coming years for two reasons, which I will examine in the following essay.

First of all, due to the latest technological advancements, people are encouraged to shift from using fossil fuels for energy to more renewable and clean energy sources. To illustrate, the invention of electric cars, especially Tesla, provided a great alternative for people, since it runs purely on electricity, which is cheaper than petrol. This invention motivated many people to shift from vehicles with fuel to electric cars, which reduces the usage of fossil fuels. We can already notice this effect in the USA, where more and more people are purchasing the Tesla, electric cars, over the cars that run on gasoline. For instance, my uncle, who is 58 years old, used cars that run on petrol all his life, even he purchased a new electric car. I am sure that with coming advancements in science and new inventions will surely shift towards an eco-friendlier source of energy.

Second, excessive usage of fossil fuels will lead to adverse consequences. We, people, cannot afford to cause any more damage, since there has been enough damage already caused by our activities like deforestation, sand mining, coal-burning, and many others. For example, global warming is one of the consequences, which we face now, is mainly due to the excessive level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, which is mainly produced by the burning of fossil fuels. Many world nations are introducing stringent laws to reduce the emission of carbon dioxide. For instance, recently all the world nations pledged to reduce their carbon dioxide emission by half by 2050. With the laws becoming more and more strict, the usage of fossil fuels will reduce in twenty years.

In conclusion, I believe that the usage of fossil fuels will decline because of the latest technological advancements and the urge to preserve the earth.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03943661972 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6281010815 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501408450704 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.9069005599 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.785714286 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337258243738 0.236089414692 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120814573951 0.076458572812 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128502037772 0.0737576698707 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239315410446 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108002089949 0.0645574589148 167% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.