To start with, housing is likely the largest expense and for those living in mega cities rent payments account for over 40% of their paycheck. However, finding just one roommate can shave 30%-50% off basic living expenses, including rent, utilities, and even food if they are willing to share groceries.
The second option is less effective. Electronic products tend to be durable: for instance, new iPhones should last a minimum of three years and Android phones are designed to last two years minimum. So a majority of users already do not buy new ones frequently. If one buys new products habitually, chances are that he does not fall short of money at all. Admittedly, a few tech enthusiasts prefer to spend a significant amount of savings buying latest gadgets. Yet, such behavior makes sense to them, because it is their lifelong hobby. It’s hard to persuade them to sacrifice their passion to save money.
The last method is impractical. Today’s employees are as busy as a bee. Some of them even follow a 996 schedule, working from 9 am to 9 pm for six days per week, leaving nearly no time for shopping groceries and cooking. When they return home after a day’s back-breaking work, all they want is a quick dinner and a good rest. Buying ingredients, cooking at home and cleaning up, though cheaper than eating outside or ordering and eating takeout food, take a lot of time and are the straw that breaks the camel’s back.
To sum up, living with others can lower monthly spending markedly, whereas the other two choices cannot.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'buying the latest'.
Suggestion: buying the latest
...o spend a significant amount of savings buying latest gadgets. Yet, such behavior makes sense...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, thus, whereas, for instance, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1977.66487455 65% => OK
No of words: 266.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84210526316 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50940905633 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.710526315789 0.524837075471 135% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 618.680645161 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.5951986654 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8666666667 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25999467114 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611895920204 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050509019055 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123871082889 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522764240558 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.