In classroom conversation teachers and in meeting leader says something incorrect but every person right to correct it. Different people have various ways to correct the mistake. From my point of view, I wait until the class and meeting is over and the people are gone, after talk to the teacher or leader because of respect to the owner or teacher, correct mistake with clear doubt and not create the disturbance.
To begin with, talk to teacher or leader after the class or meeting is one type of the respectable suggestion. For example, One month ago, my boss took the conference meeting in which he invited the many business men of the other company. In conversation my boss says that capsule made 4-5 mm size and price is only 3 rupees. That I know that my boss said the wrong size but I did not say that time and after meeting break I told him that capsules 3-4 mm. My boss said thank you and after break he corrected his mistake. If I interrupt to conversation then, my boss and other people was wrong think about my boss judgment and cancel the project. Therefore, it is better to say after and maintain the reputation and respect of the boss and teachers.
Furthermore, all time we think is not true. In some of cases we are wrong teacher are right say but we have misconception. For instance, my biology classes my teacher talk about the fungi and that time I have not knowledge about that but I read this topic before. In class, when teacher said that fungi is not harm for human that time I have doubt that I read that fungi cause disease but I misunderstand fungi use in plant which is not harm for human. So this misunderstanding I solve by I asking to teacher not interrupted in class and in conversation I got the two benefits, first is clear mistake and second is get the deep understanding about the fungi.
Moreover, if teacher and leader mistake and I not correct than it is bad effect on me and teacher or leader also. One way, if I not told them that he said something incorrect then, other people also have misunderstanding when after if, student or other member know bed effect to the speaker knowledge. Another way, if correct mistake right away is not good because of all students or other member is disturb. That's why, it is better to talk after the lecture and meeting.
In brief, when teacher and boss make mistake, I talk them to after finish the class or meeting because of it is good manner, maintain the reputation of the owner or teachers, misunderstanding easily solve and get the knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the cases') or simply say ''some cases''.
Suggestion: some of the cases; some cases
...more, all time we think is not true. In some of cases we are wrong teacher are right say but ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...an. So this misunderstanding I solve by I asking to teacher not interrupted in cl...
^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... bad effect on me and teacher or leader also. One way, if I not told them that he sa...
^^^^
Line 4, column 400, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disturbed'.
Suggestion: disturbed
...ause of all students or other member is disturb. Thats why, it is better to talk after ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 409, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ll students or other member is disturb. Thats why, it is better to talk after the lec...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in brief, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 9.8082437276 0% => OK
Conjunction : 35.0 13.8261648746 253% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 457.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54266958425 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58172864434 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.409190371991 0.524837075471 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 637.2 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1772371545 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.85 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270549560464 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0911940603934 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843148392649 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163220938463 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950817032913 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.