Needless to say, every single person is susceptible to making a mistake in his/her profession, and teachers are not an exception. The crucial matter is how the audiences should behave in such a circumstance. While some people assert that it is essential to correct the instructor or speaker immediately, others believe otherwise and think it is better to discuss the presenter after the meeting privately. There is a third group that prefers to ignore the mistakes and say nothing.
I personally have the same mind as the second group. In what follows, I will present and elaborate on two reasons to substantiate my point of view.
First, The most prominent point to be mentioned is that waiting until the end of meeting to give the leader has a significant role in demonstrating audience respect to
lecturer. Interrupting the lecturer is neither moral nor decent because a good presenter must have taught time and made an effort defenitly to give the best speech. Make a pause between the present, the audience will give stress and pressure to the presenter. it might affect the presenter’s concentration, consequently, has a negative impact on the remaining present. However, it’s better for the audience to wait until a suitable moment, which is usually at the end of a meeting to correct the mistake or tell his/her perspective.
Second, Even by making a mistake during the presentation, the lecturer may correct the mistake or give an alternative option which covers the audience's idea. Although, another possibility exists including the audience mistake of the present. The wrong interruption not only could waste others time, but also the misunderstanding may not be solved clearly in the short time of the interruption. If we correct the lecturer's idea at the end of class or meeting, not only students can understand what the lecturer is talking about, but also the questioner has time to listen to the remaining presentation and review his/her question.
To sum up, despite the fact that we should neglect others' mistakes or interrupt their speech immediately and correct wrong ideas, I strongly believe that respecting others is the key factor before doing any action. We should consider many factors while arguing with a person in meetings or classes because it has a negative impact on the lecturer's self-confidence and it’s possible the question is answered in the remaining time of the presentation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ole in demonstrating audience respect to lecturer. Interrupting the lecturer is n...
^^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...e stress and pressure to the presenter. it might affect the presenter’s concentrat...
^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'audiences'' or 'audience's'?
Suggestion: audiences'; audience's
... an alternative option which covers the audiences idea. Although, another possibility exi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...option which covers the audiences idea. Although, another possibility exists including t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 413, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
... of the interruption. If we correct the lecturers idea at the end of class or meeting, no...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, while, talking about, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2037.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14393939394 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9536636429 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540404040404 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4277410978 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.823529412 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2941176471 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186846796008 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559615152654 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543168646587 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972336268557 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490559988204 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.