No one can deny that there are pros and cons of being an erudite personality in multi subjects than being connoisseur of a subject. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely take a stance of being dexterous in specific one. It is my firm belief that expert in a subject matter would definitely help a person in his life for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, a person with adroit in a subject rather being jack of all would definitely progress in his life and get sustain in long run. This kind of personality always can accumulate lots of implicit ideas, which would definitely help him become an innovative one. As a result, he can be more pragmatic in the field of job and will be able to give more output. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by one of my friend. For example, he had penchant over a business since his childhood. His study about the business was so detailed and well researched that he invested his money on share market. Although he didn't have copious of money at initial stage, he got success in his later life. This example demonstrate that how the adroitness in a subject matter help a person to become a successful businessman.
Secondly, a well educated person in a specific subject is revered by the society and nation, which makes it possible to earn a good fame. So that, he would be able to live with dignity and can become the pillar of society who is always loved by the nation. Drawing from the experience of great poet Laxmi Prasad Devekota, it is clear that he was respected by the nation because of his knowledge. He lived his life in such dignity that people all over the country still revered him for his knowledge and contribution in the Nepalese literature. It is certainly clear to see why a knowledgeable person is worshiped by the people.
Lastly, I have to admit that in rare case jack of all is better, but not always. These days, when you can show that you do have penchant over so many things, you can get lots of attention from people. For instance, we can take a movie star posing as if they know many things in the story, which is certainly bogus. Moreover, their pose just in case of the story line of the movie for commercial purpose. In fact, movie star have only dexterity in the acting field, but not in the role they act. From this, it is clear that movie actor are the acting connoisseur not jack of every role they act.
For all the reasons I have stated above, an expert in a subject can be revered by the people and can get success in life. If we want to get success, we need to focus in one thing rather than involving in many things.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 652, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... his money on share market. Although he didnt have copious of money at initial stage,...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 745, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'demonstrates'.
Suggestion: demonstrates
...success in his later life. This example demonstrate that how the adroitness in a subject ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...are case jack of all is better, but not always. These days, when you can show that you...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, for instance, in fact, kind of, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2216.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 501.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42315369261 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45084260116 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465069860279 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 719.1 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.540783019 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.3333333333 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.79166666667 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190479378142 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547582816022 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523957043426 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11855926219 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515926437001 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.