Working hours are undoubtedly a crucial thing in humans life. A controversial argument that is often raised regarding this topic is whether to work more days a week with shorter hours or opposit. If I were obliged to choose, I would think that it's better to work three days a week for long hours than five days for shorter hours for several reasons, on a few of which I will elaborate subsequently.
To begin with, I believe that working 3 days a week would let you spend more time on your personal desires. In this scenario, you have 4 days a week to devise plans and do your favorite activities. I believe my opinion is partially influenced by my personal experience. You see, once I have been working in a company three days a week but for longer hours, those three days I was in a company all day, but instead, I could spend the rest of the week with my hobbies and I was so happy about that. I took the gym, and art classes and still had time to rest and chill.
Secondly, I think longer days at work are more efficient. When you're concentrated on your work for hours you do your tasks better. For instance, 3 years earlier, when I was working in an office five days a week, there were times that I was so deep getting my jobs done, got warmed up and concentrated, and all of the sudden, it was time to go home and I had to let go everything and go home. I am a programmer and I need long hours of concentration to get my jobs done.
Finally, I think it has fewer costs to go to work three days a week instead of five days. You have to take the bus, train, etc. for going to work. Also, there are a waste of time on transitions, the cost of eating at the office, and lots of other costs. Instead, if you do more in each time you go to work by working for longer hours, these kinda costs will be reduced so much.
I resist the temptation to explain more, hoping there is enough information already. To sum it up, as the reasons suggest, working three days a week for longer hours is better. Because not only it'll let you have more personal time, but you can do better in longer hours of work and also it costs less.
- TOEFL T P O 1 Integrated Writing Task 3
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 50
- An airship is a type of aircraft that flies using a very large balloon filled with a lighter than air gas Airships were an important means of air transportation before the 1940s but are little used today having been largely replaced by airplanes and helic 83
- TOEFL T P O 1 Integrated Writing Task 3
- Did bees a type of insect exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests The structures have been found inside 200 million year old fossilized trees i 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...res. In this scenario, you have 4 days a week to devise plans and do your favorit...
^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: you're
...r days at work are more efficient. When youre concentrated on your work for hours you...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE_SUDDEN[1]
Message: This phrase is nonstandard. Did you mean 'all of a sudden'?
Suggestion: all of a sudden
...ne, got warmed up and concentrated, and all of the sudden, it was time to go home and I had to le...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, for instance, i think, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.20487804878 4.8611393121 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36507907863 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460975609756 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 533.7 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7597481588 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.540714219471 0.236089414692 229% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174172029342 0.076458572812 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106322696452 0.0737576698707 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.336845980035 0.150856017488 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598305287248 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 58.1214874552 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.08 10.9000537634 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.01818996416 86% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.