Nowadays, an increasing number of people are concerned about how to distribute the money to support Internet access and the public transportation. However, whether it is more important for the governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation is a controversial issue. My view is that it is more important for governments to give financial supports to improve public transportation.
First, it is obvious that advanced public transportation could help the economic development of a country. This is because advanced public transportation, to some extent, means a high level of transportation, which could help the trades in the country develop much faster and go to more remote regions. Also, the advanced public transportation could reduce the traffic jam in the busy cities, and in return, decrease the time people spend on their way to work, increasing the efficiency of the daytime and the time people could spend on their works. So, it is important for the governments to spend money to improve the public transportation.
Moreover, improving the public transportation could help protect our living environment. For example, when the public transportation is enough advanced and convenient, residents would more intend to choose the public transportation as their way to go out. And this intendance would cause the less demands of the private vehicles, reducing the number of cars in the city. Thus, the pollution from cars would also decrease significantly, helping protect our living environment from the pollution of cars and traffic jams.
This is not to say that the access of Internet is not worthy of financial support of the governments. Of course, improving the Internet access could increase the potential job chances for people, since they could browse the websites to find potential jobs and try to get the jobs with convenience. But compared with the basic conditions of life, such as the public transportation, the priority of improving the Internet access is less than to improve the public transportation. Just like what we usually do when we choose dream places for our future home, we will tend to choose the places nearby the main roads or buses, for it is convenient for us to go to work or school.
In sum, governments should spend money to improve public transportation rather than to improve the internet access. Meanwhile, we should not ignore that after the finish of the improvement of the public transportation, we should also try to improve the Internet access. By doing this, we could make sure the stable and rapid development of the whole society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun demands is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ut. And this intendance would cause the less demands of the private vehicles, reduci...
^^^^
Line 7, column 523, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to dream'
Suggestion: to dream
... like what we usually do when we choose dream places for our future home, we will ten...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2212.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19248826291 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06799878493 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429577464789 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 662.4 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3746674479 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.888888889 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.572178229924 0.236089414692 242% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224504286462 0.076458572812 294% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.2287742254 0.0737576698707 310% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.363399212436 0.150856017488 241% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179336395776 0.0645574589148 278% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.