Learning about the past has no value for those living in the present
They say that the past has no worth for those of us living in the present. However, studying the past helps us build and ensure a more flourishing present as the knowledge in such areas as medicine, architecture and building is directly related to the past.
Indeed, past events are of great value, especially in the realm of medicine. Knowledge about endemic and pandemic diseases, medical practices, as well as cures, from the past can be brought through generations, making the progress in the field of medicine more considerable. Medical annals provide us with the profound and exhaustive knowledge how to fight against deadly diseases, such as plague or malaria. Without this, the mankind would have died out.
By the same token, there are a lot of things brought from the past, one of them is the architecture, one of the oldest science presented till present. This allows us to create comfortable and safe buildings nowadays. Moreover, the preserved buildings from the past became an object of cultural heritage. The most famous of them are now presented at the museums and are available to the general public. Similarly, anyone gaining the major in the corresponding field can gather additional information from the past which can be used today.
Furthermore, “knowledge is power”, they say, which implies that people working in such areas as politics feel themselves as a much stronger and a comfortable on the meeting with foreigners. There is a concept of making the visit of foreign colleagues more comfortable in order to strengthen relations between the countries by recreating the traditions from the past. This comfort could be created via using national dress or cooking national dishes for the guests.
In conclusion, there is a strong connection between the past experience and today’s life. However, each individual must nonetheless decide for themselves whether it is still a worthwhile expense.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-09 | theprasad | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | fanassertive | 71 | view |
| 2023-03-11 | Alina_irfan | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-08 | ngaliulin | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-08 | ngaliulin | 60 | view |
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellows or co workers than from those at higher level such as teachers or supervisors 73
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to so much information creates problems Which view do you agree with 85
- palaeontology
- Some young adults want independence from their parents as soon as possible Other young adults prefer to live with their families for a longer time Which of these situations do you think is better 90
- Altruistic behavior 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...at the museums and are available to the general public. Similarly, anyone gaining the major in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gains'.
Suggestion: gains
...o the general public. Similarly, anyone gaining the major in the corresponding field ca...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...here is a strong connection between the past experience and today’s life. However, each individ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, similarly, still, then, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 311.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1961414791 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84879838473 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585209003215 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0019530844 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 5.45110844103 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236257233575 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755972270519 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10745230433 0.0737576698707 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129136076316 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100700853285 0.0645574589148 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.