Not surprisingly, many aspects of people's daily life have been undergone a wide range of changes due to the fast pace of advances in technology. The discussion has centered on whether everyone's lifestyle has become easier and more convenient or not, because of advances in transportation systems, various telecommunication devices and to mention but a few other facilities. While I believe it can not be generalized to all aspects of life, at a broad perspective, it can be true based on the following argument.
On the positive side, the upsurge facilities in communication allow people spend less time on compulsory activities, hence, having more pleasure time to enjoy from sedimentary life style. First, through the internet, a huge amount of daily works have been done by phones such as shopping, banking especially business transactions without any needs for traveling monotonous and routine distance. In addition, in those cases with the urgent traveling to the remote areas, rapid transportation systems such as private planes or well-equipped metros have made it possible for people to reduce the amount of time on commuting. Therefore, people's living condition has been changed to be easier.
Furthermore, different communication devices have paved the ways for expanding social circle. In the past, most social relationships were limited by geographical distance and others lack of facilities. However, not only do advances in technology allow people to communicate with each other via devices like phones or laptops but also help them to have more comfortable and convenient ways of connection. Through convoluted applications such as Skype or Whatapp, abroad students can keep in touch with their families and motherland friends by sending their sounds and images. Apparently, mobile is regarded as an inevitable device and social key for every user in today's modern society which increase life convenience.
On the negative side, the problems related to these achievements should not be overlooked. Firstly, the ubiquity of social communication devices require longer employees' involvement and commitment to their own works. Even if they are on vacations, for example, the internet access phone or e-mail has made them more accessible for responding to their superiors. Compared to the past, this condition not only causes worker to have longer working hours but also pose them on the threat of stress and other related consequences.
To recapitulate, thanks to technological advances, people now have longer pleasure-time that can be allocated to develop their social relations or enjoy from higher level of welfare. Nevertheless, some stress related diseases have appeared as the consequence of more involvement in the career issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...al communication devices require longer employees involvement and commitment to their own...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'apparently', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'in addition', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.265217391304 0.229887763892 115% => OK
Verbs: 0.145652173913 0.158761421928 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.126086956522 0.0866891130778 145% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0565217391304 0.046263068375 122% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0282608695652 0.0685040099705 41% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128260869565 0.118717715034 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0673913043478 0.0351676179071 192% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.08436225103 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0391304347826 0.0309702414327 126% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0608695652174 0.0887237588012 69% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0130434782609 0.0209618222197 62% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00217391304348 0.0139019557991 16% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2701.0 2387.08602151 113% => OK
No of words: 416.0 408.028673835 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.49278846154 5.86048508987 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.432692307692 0.338922669872 128% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.322115384615 0.251872472559 128% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.235576923077 0.174417080927 135% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.173076923077 0.112833075102 153% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08436225103 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591346153846 0.524397521467 113% => OK
Word variations: 72.2013273182 59.2087087015 122% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6684587814 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.1111111111 20.5533526081 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1762591986 48.84282405 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.055555556 120.699889404 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 20.5533526081 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.05555555556 0.644075263715 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 55.3226495726 45.7405998639 121% => OK
Elegance: 2.0 1.45489161554 137% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0980169940401 0.300154397459 33% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0620045673585 0.103427244359 60% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0399699151407 0.0752933317313 53% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.521361486905 0.497263757937 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.121451920329 0.151897553556 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0394800629642 0.114077575197 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278907674953 0.0781384742642 36% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.273856539503 0.336927656856 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0273278866778 0.067059652881 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0628539776488 0.210909579961 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362570870642 0.0618886996521 59% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.91756272401 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.