Without a shadow of a doubt, protecting the Earth from anthropogenic and natural threats has become the most important issue these days. An unanswered question in this area is how the government can cope with the environmental threats from companies. Despite some arguments asserting that specifying taxation for companies is the most effective way to discourage them from decreasing their adverse effects on the Earth, I believe otherwise, maintaining that this policy is not effective enough. In the following paragraphs, I will elaborate on my viewpoint through two compelling reasons.
The first exquisite point corroborating my stance on this subject is that companies would increase their products' and services' price, and people have to pay high tax on products. More specifically, due to the products and services of these companies directly and indirectly, affect individuals' lives, these firms are sure that even if the cost of their products is increased, people purchase their products. So the government’s policy not only persuades them to refine their production systems, but it also puts a significant burden on people. For example, my country's governments enacted taxation to mitigate the environmentally harmful process of industries. Food Corporations that play a pivotal role in polluting the air have continued their previous food production method without any positive changes.
The second reason to be mentioned is that the government would be reluctant to lose a significant amount of money earning by enforcing companies to pay high taxes. The government spends its extra-earned budgets on other expenditures like fortifying military power. Since the government must maintain its income, the government prefers that companies go on their harmful manufacturing process instead of cutting their products. Furthermore, the government would stop funding research investigating ways to decrease the adverse effect of industries on the environment. Therefore, obligating taxation for companies is not an effective way to control companies from contaminating the environment.
Reflecting upon the reasons mentioned above, one soon realizes that policymakers should employ better ways to manage important industries’ air and water pollution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7380952381 4.8611393121 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1545990524 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595238095238 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1742098352 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.533333333 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193525593048 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617203010566 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481961629416 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104423050891 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400275131411 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 11.7677419355 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 58.1214874552 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 10.9000537634 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.