As we all know, human beings are social animals, and the biggest enemy in our lives is alienation. Thus, possessing a long-lasting friendship is beneficial to us. Nevertheless, when comes to this topic, a general controversy arises. Some people reckon that friends who have similar interests with us enable the friendship to last for a long time, while others hold a different viewpoint that trust determines the quality of friendship. As far as I am concerned, I believe friends who always give hands to us whenever we are facing a crisis are the prerequisite of a long-lasting friendship.
In the first place, as a renowned saying goes, "a friend in need is a friend indeed". A genuine friend can offer some assistance to you when you are facing either an emotional crisis or a financial crisis, leading to the lasting of the friendship. To illustrate, when you are enduring too much pressure caused by earning money and living, this type of friend will be willing to sit beside you and listen to your complaints with patience. In front of him, you can vent your emotions with ease and never need to pretend to be anyone else. When you are imposed too much financial burden resulting from the expensive rental fee of an apartment or you need some money for urgent affairs, this quintessential friend will put in your shoes and spare no efforts to aid you to escape from this awful condition. With this kind of friendship, you can not only share happiness but also sorrow.
On the other hand, although it is undeniable that we can enjoy a lot of pleasure with friends who possess similar interests and viewpoints to us, these interests can change as we age. For example, when I and a friend were in primary school, we were indulged in the magical world created by the Harry Potter series, talking about the plots and characters day and night. But after entering the university, our interests enormously changed. I prefer doing in-depth psychological research in my spare time, while my old friend would like to invest more time and energy in photography. Thus, we were not able to express our ideas enthusiastically anymore, and the friendship eventually faded off.
In addition, we must admit that trust is like the concrete frame of architecture, without which any friendship cannot be generated. Nevertheless, the fact that we attach great importance to trust does not justify that trust is the only and the most critical element of a friendship. Sometimes, that a friend who totally trusts you but does not do any further action to help you can hurt your heart more severely. A friend who only has trust cannot help you grapple with a crisis emerging from life.
In a nutshell, we ought to make more emphasis on the significance of possessing friends that assist us when we are mired in troubles. This type of good companions can not only relieve our loneliness and pressure but also light the candle for us when we are walking in the darkness.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, kind of, talking about, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2464.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 510.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83137254902 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76986308038 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511764705882 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9231641029 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223922046279 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715714189822 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712740194046 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125648329708 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892630069858 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, kind of, talking about, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2464.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 510.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83137254902 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75217629947 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76986308038 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511764705882 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 759.6 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.51792114695 284% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9231641029 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1818181818 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223922046279 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715714189822 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712740194046 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125648329708 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892630069858 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.