A controversial debate which is raised about the role of modern transportation in our lives. Some people hold the view that modern transportation encourages people to own more cars thus contributes to more road traffics and accidents. However, some others may have an opposing view and feel that modern technology creates environment-friendly vehicles which save our world. From my vantage view, I concur with the later groups and feel that modern transportation has made our world a safer place to live in because of the less carbon dioxide air emission.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that modern transportation may save the environment. Most of the previously developed cars were relying on gas as a source of energy to operate. However, with the latest introduction of electric cars, people are able to drive these cars without the need for fuel. Although batteries may not be easy to recycle, These vehicles can save the environment from the green gas effect, undesirable phenomena caused by the release of carbon dioxide into the air. A vivid example which shed light on what was elaborated above is Tesla cars. In fact, such cars are called "zero emission" cars, which means that these cars have engines which do not allow the release any traces of carbon dioxide into the air. Thus, none of these cars contribute to global warming.
The second point which deserves some words here is that modern transportation vehicles do not need fuel to operate. As a result, can save us money. For instance, a car can be plugged into electricity at night and crosses 400 miles the second day without the need for fuel. if the same fuel car is to cross the same distance, it would need 5 gallons of gas which costs $40. Similarly, A fuel-operated car would need at least $90 to cross another 500 miles. Moreover, fuel operated cars may cost the owners more money as fuel becomes more expensive.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no means the only reasons available. In fact, There is another subtle point that is worth to be mentioned. The noteworthy, refreshing, intelligible study published in the Amecian car magazine Journal. The study shows that governments significantly encourages people to operate electric cars because of two reasons. The first reason is the tax cuts which allows people not only to save money, but also to have refunds that reduce the total car's cost, and the second reason is the possibility of driving those cars on pool lanes which are less crowded and allow people to arrive at the destination at a faster pace.
To wrap up, contemplating the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes the importance of modern transportation technology in creating a better place to live. Such technology does not only preserve the environment but also can save us money by saving fuel consumption.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[3]
Message: Did you mean 'to fuel'?
Suggestion: to fuel
...ern transportation vehicles do not need fuel to operate. As a result, can save us mo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...e second day without the need for fuel. if the same fuel car is to cross the same ...
^^
Line 7, column 408, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e electric cars because of two reasons. The first reason is the tax cuts which allo...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, similarly, so, thus, at least, for instance, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2413.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 486.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96502057613 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86986587894 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493827160494 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 762.3 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4004623107 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.541666667 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95833333333 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150986483537 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471326305415 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872711869887 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105908036369 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109029195813 0.0645574589148 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.