A controversial debate is often raised about the ways universities should spend their money to improve the education standard. Some group of people hold the view that universities should spend money to increase professors wages in return for their services. Some others, on the other hand, would hold a different view and firmly believe that this money should be spent on improving university facilities. From my vantage point, I concur with the later group by giving two reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that universities who spend money on increasing professors wages does not enough left to spend on other facilities. Universities need budget to repair classrooms, libraries , and labs. Without enough money available to maintain these facilities students would have difficulties in learning. A vivid example which illustrate my viewpoint is the biology lab experiment that was cancelled last week due to the lack of equipments. In other words paying more money to professors might compromise the quality of education offered to students.
The second reason which deserves some words is that professors may have external donation from outside sources to support their work. On the other hand,th donations from outside sources may not be enough to cover the money needed to make the renovations. For instance, the cost of renovating only the library cost the university $ 200 thousand. Because of the lack of funds the university had to cover this money from their own pocket.
Although the aforementioned reasons are the first to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no means the only reasons available. In fact, there is another subtle reason. The noteworthy, refreshing result of a study which was published in the American education Journal which showed that universities which spend more money on renovating their building improve their ranking score when compare to other universities. This study was conducted on 120 university to avoid any bias.
To wrap up, contemplating the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that universities need lots of money for renovations. Spending more money on professors wages may compromise the services offered to students
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d budget to repair classrooms, libraries , and labs. Without enough money availabl...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of education offered to students. The second reason which deserves some wo...
^^^
Line 7, column 152, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , th
...to support their work. On the other hand,th donations from outside sources may not ...
^^^
Line 7, column 330, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$200'.
Suggestion: $200
...ng only the library cost the university $ 200 thousand. Because of the lack of funds ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 346, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ary cost the university $ 200 thousand. Because of the lack of funds the university had...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, for instance, in fact, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3591954023 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86921592077 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525862068966 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4148320903 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1578947368 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3157894737 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42105263158 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218086684368 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717997480682 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397723443974 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128289881216 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376813544032 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.