Nowadays, an increasing number of citizens are discussing the recent launch of the Shenzhou carrier rocket. While there are some people who claim that this kind of launch is a waste of time or energy because it could not bring any benefit to citizens, I hold a different opinion. From my perspective, space exploration is necessary.
Admittedly, space travel or space exploration would waste a large sum of money. By spending much money on doing research regarding outer space life, the government loses its focus on civil circumstances; there is no doubt that people would complain about the government's aloft behaviors. However, if viewing from a different angle, space exploration is a long time investment. Never should we expect the journey would bring immediate economic returns to the country. In this case, space travel and exploration is quite helpful for the country.
First of all, space exploration might bring benefits for us to search for new energy resources. This means that other planets may be rich in certain kinds of resources that are in great shortage on the Earth. According to the report released after the exploration of Mars, the NASA officials confirm that Mars contains a significant volume of natural gas and iron. Moreover, engineers have also noticed that these resources on the planet are able to explore, and if they could solve the problem of long time transportation, these resources could be used on Earth. Consequently, the use of natural gas will not consume the burning of petroleum and make our planet a better place to live.
Besides, space exploration aims to improve the level of technology. In other words, it is the development of advanced technology that makes it is possible to explore outer space. It is usually the case that without the technology of launching satellites into space, it is impossible for people to conduct research. As a result, scientists have to improve their knowledge in related areas so that they could guarantee the launch of these rockets, as well as satellites. Also, to fill with enough oxygen, scientists have to run encapsulation tests again and again. Only this equipment is guaranteed can astronauts be safe working in outer space.
To sum up, the seemly useless space exploration would cost a large sum of money; however, this space activity could still bring benefits in both new searching and technology improvement.
Nowadays, an increasing number of citizens are discussing the recent launch of the Shenzhou carrier rocket. While there are some people who claim that this kind of launch is a waste of time or energy because it could not bring any benefit to citizens, I hold a different opinion. From my perspective, space exploration is necessary.
Admittedly, space travel or space exploration would waste a large sum of money. By spending much money on doing research regarding outer space life, the government loses its focus on civil circumstances; there is no doubt that people would complain about the government's aloft behaviors. However, if viewing from a different angle, space exploration is a long time investment. Never should we expect the journey would bring immediate economic returns to the country. In this case, space travel and exploration is quite helpful for the country.
First of all, space exploration might bring benefits for us to search for new energy resources. This means that other planets may be rich in certain kinds of resources that are in great shortage on the Earth. According to the report released after the exploration of Mars, the NASA officials confirm that Mars contains a significant volume of natural gas and iron. Moreover, engineers have also noticed that these resources on the planet are able to explore, and if they could solve the problem of long time transportation, these resources could be used on Earth. Consequently, the use of natural gas will not consume the burning of petroleum and make our planet a better place to live.
Besides, space exploration aims to improve the level of technology. In other words, it is the development of advanced technology that makes it is possible to explore outer space. It is usually the case that without the technology of launching satellites into space, it is impossible for people to conduct research. As a result, scientists have to improve their knowledge in related areas so that they could guarantee the launch of these rockets, as well as satellites. Also, to fill with enough oxygen, scientists have to run encapsulation tests again and again. Only this equipment is guaranteed can astronauts be safe working in outer space.
To sum up, the seemly useless space exploration would cost a large sum of money; however, this space activity could still bring benefits in both new searching and technology improvement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-06 | Junjie Yue | 90 | view |
- debating if developing various skills can be more helpful for career 70
- global 70
- debating if developing various skills can be more helpful for career 70
- According to the reading passage we know that there are three different theories about how agnostid could have lived However the lecture refutes these three ideas one by one with strong arguments First the writer demonstrates a theory that agnostids are f 78
- People who develop many different skills are more successful 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, well, while, kind of, no doubt, as a result, as well as, first of all, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12944162437 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79073926932 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558375634518 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.409317716 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.05 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1 5.45110844103 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258672701978 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800238851284 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150763795332 0.0737576698707 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198578372632 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.269447314522 0.0645574589148 417% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.