These days, many schools and universities let students do some group projects, and all members of the group receive the same grade on it. I disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate students. I will tell you three reasons to support my opinion.
First, if they get the same score, they will have a friend who will suffer. As we can see from dramas and movies, if they do group projects, they will have a friend who does nothing and friends who do everything alone. Therefore, it is unfair to give the same score to them. It is unfair to give the same score just because they are on the same team because students are justified in getting a score as they try. In fact, one of my classmates did not contact me and participate at all, but we got the same score, so that time, I was so angry.
Second, it will lose purpose. The main purpose of the group project is to achieve harmony and cooperation with each other, but in reality, the majority are fighting, angry, and intimidating. So, rather than teamwork, it seems like there is a division of teams or one person leads them all. I think this way is difficult to implement because it does not even achieve its purpose.
Last, it is so unfair if everyone gets the same score with a low score. The score is a sensitive part of many students. High school students are very important for their scores. Therefore, many students pay a lot of attention to getting a score cut, but if they get a low score because of teamwork, they will feel more sad then when they did not do well in the test.
Of course, there are advantages, but it is a task that bothers students every time. That is why it is an evaluation method that needs to be improved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 14, column 324, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...se of teamwork, they will feel more sad then when they did not do well in the test. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, therefore, well, i think, in fact, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 52.1666666667 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42153846154 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36406229456 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513846153846 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0774496305 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.8333333333 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30585281599 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10095533348 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14141744851 0.0737576698707 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183674768901 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.200629817659 0.0645574589148 311% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.06 10.9000537634 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 86.8835125448 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.