people do many tasks to improve their natural environment. which of the following tasks do you prefer and why?1. plant trees and make parks2. using fewer plastic bags when shopping3. use public transportation

Essay topics:

people do many tasks to improve their natural environment. which of the following tasks do you prefer and why?
1. plant trees and make parks
2. using fewer plastic bags when shopping
3. use public transportation

The earth has been developed enormously with the advent of sophisticated technologies. Parallel to this, greenhouse effect, deforestation, drought, contamination are the fatal consequences of human beings that put the world in a vulnerable situation. There are several factors people could do in order to save our environment like plant trees and create parks, persuade local shops to stop providing plastic and improve and encourage people to use public transportation. However, the popular salient to which I vehemently cling is that people should try to use public transportation because it is more advantageous than other factors. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.

To commence with, although there are many tasks that people can do to save our planet, public transportation is one of the utmost important factors that play a consequential role in any given society. Broadly speaking, majorities of societies suffer from air pollution and fuel produced by automobiles, which create some problems for individuals. As a tangible example, in countries that public transportation is developed, they do not face problem regarding pollution and people lead a healthy life without any harmful disease. Indeed, with using public transportation not only can we develop our natural environment but also can provide an opportunity for people to lead a healthy lifestyle. To elucidate more on this issue, hardly can a society flourish and thrive without an improved public transportation owing to the fact that it helps the community to survive in the long run and not to be polluted.

Another salient point in corroborating my stance is that if the government encourage people to use public transportation, not only can we save our environment but also can get to our destination on time without lateness. If we take a minute to ponder over it, crowds of people criticize about traffic jam and they have trials and tribulations getting to their destination in time. Not until people use the public transportation, can the problem of traffic jam be solved vigorously. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that we have to use improved transportation in order to be able to save our society and eradicate myriads of problems regarding traffics and diseases. If we neglect such important task, we will soon witness a society falling behind.

However, every coin has two sides. Other factors would certainly be helpful for the community. For instance, the government should require people not to use plastic bags when shopping owing to the fact that these plastics are made up of chemical ingredients. So, not only can this plastic put our health in danger but also can be unwholesome for the natural environment because they take many years to decompose. However, it was a story in a nutshell, actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal viewpoint.

In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that people have many tasks to do in order to save their natural environment. One of the most significant tasks is using public transportation because it provides fertile ground for people to lead a healthy life and avoid air pollution by using fewer cars. In addition, it helps people avoid lateness because it would be able to cover every region in the town. However, other factors like not using plastic bags or plant trees might be helpful or useful as well.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, regarding, so, well, broadly speaking, for instance, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 52.1666666667 157% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.0752688172 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2952.0 1977.66487455 149% => OK
No of words: 579.0 407.700716846 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09844559585 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90534594407 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96856677531 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466321243523 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 937.8 618.680645161 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6662466381 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 5.45110844103 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30499890802 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881706315307 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817871993704 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191030417718 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0903090664093 0.0645574589148 140% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.