People who live in large cities can better take care of their family than those who live in small towns or villages.
By and large, family has been an integrated part of our life which should be looked after particularly as its members grow older. Its importance leads to some controversy; some people want to know living in which place can provide their family with better care. One statement in this case that is often brought up is that living in a large city is better, but I personally think living in a small town or village is better than vice versa. In the lines to follow, I will investigate two reasons to shed light on my response.
The first reason worthy of note is that living in a large city would bring about a hectic lifestyle compared to living in a small city or village. People in a large city have to work harder due to large expenses. Furthermore, the heavy traffic congestion causes people to wake up and get to work sooner and get back later which these would cause tiredness even at the weekend, so they have little time to take care of their families. Take, for instance, the city of Tehran in which always street are congested and it takes four hours to commute between offices and home on average. When people get back to home, they are not only exhausted but also nervous. Therefore, all these reasons causes unwillingness to sacrifice free time to the expense of losing their free time.
The second reason that contributes to taking care of family to is the natural places specially parks to take advantage of the fresh air which hardly can be find found in a large city. Usually in a small city, there is are quiet parks with a good weather condition that parents not only can enjoy from them (sin 5) but also can get to know people in at their same age. Take, for instance, an octogenarian parents who are is alone in home. They need someone to discuss with whom they have many things in common to talk with, so parks in a small city with a throng of old individuals are the favorable place for them. Moreover, in the small city or village, people are more close to each other and it is easier to take parent to visit relatives while in a large city they are constricted to the home and it has always been problematic for children to bring back their parents in a large city when they have taken them to visit relatives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-22 | esmaeilrezaei68 | 71 | view |
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.•Wait until the class or meeting 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Telephone has greater influence on people’s lives than television has. 83
- Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular activity in 2010. 73
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'but' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'buts'.
Suggestion: buts
...ents not only can enjoy from them sin 5 but also can get to know people in at their...
^^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
..., for instance, an octogenarian parents who are is alone in home. They need someone to ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43795620438 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32443520776 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510948905109 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.667835041 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.6 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385642947608 0.236089414692 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118375941368 0.076458572812 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088022365601 0.0737576698707 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252357039496 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041739534006 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.