Question:
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Many people believe that a diverse type of work could more satisfy labors than a fixed one. However, in my belief, it has been a subjective topic and dependent on personal career expectations. People who are passionate about a particular task would not like to engage in different kinds of jobs. On the other hand, those who are easily getting bored with routine jobs are more likely to involve in many kinds of work.
Firstly, people who love to try different things are more likely to do different kinds of tasks. They might have diverse interests and not particularly focus on one field, so they are more likely to try to do different jobs to get the personal achievement and satisfaction. For example, Mozart is a talented musician. He was not only a great composer but also a player. His famous symphony has been favored and his playing skill is also excellent. He was expected to be obviously not satisfied if he were only composing.
Secondly, nevertheless, some people just want to focus on a specific task and don't want to be bothered by others. In other words, they are only interested in this kind of task. For instance, most scientists would like to do research out of interest. If they are required to deal with financial tasks, then they would not be happy. Because they are distracted from their interest, they would not be satisfied at all, even get irritated. Therefore, for those who have dedicated interest in their tasks, they would not be more satisfied with more different types of jobs.
Lastly, many people do not care about the content of their jobs because they just want to get a higher salary and not combine their interests with careers. For example, there are hundreds of thousands of workers working in factories in China assembling smartphones. Because of low wages, they are living under the poverty line and barely sustain their lives. What they think about is earning money, they do not pursue higher life goal. Another example is that many Africans living in a rural area, they don't have the necessary resource to survive, not to mention the content of jobs. Therefore, poor people are less likely to care about the content of jobs.
In conclusion, whether types of tasks would satisfy workers more is a subjective question. Scientists tend to focus their interest area, and passionate learners would satisfy with diverse tasks while poor people have no choice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...st want to focus on a specific task and dont want to be bothered by others. In other...
^^^^
Line 4, column 503, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...y Africans living in a rural area, they dont have the necessary resource to survive,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1993.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84914841849 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51292854684 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476885644769 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 634.5 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3782977728 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0416666667 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281382530481 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827077470521 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620800317953 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164922350602 0.150856017488 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361355431158 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.