Is relating well to others more important than
studying hard?
To earn a college degree or to have a proper education is most crucial to almost all people who want a decent job and a career-driven life. It is true that studying hard is important from many people’s perspectives. However, one does need interaction with others because a human by its definition is a social being that cannot live without help and support from others; isolation is the biggest enemy to those who determine not to survive but to thrive in their career path, for relating well to others almost equates to successful networking. In my opinion, having a good relationship with others is more important than studying hard.
To begin with, building a good relationship with others requires many social skills such as those of communication, body gesture, or emotion management, which in turn help you grow as a person with a growth mindset. It is not easy to become a grownup who is emotionally mature, and by means of making friends with those who are, from them you can actually learn many practical qualities and social skills, which are the know-how that textbooks do not generally include. Furthermore, by trying to make friends with those who are emotionally responsible, the attempt itself is a process of a mentality growing.
In addition to the importance of fostering social skills, networking is as well as crucial to one who desires career success. As we all know, earning a high-paid job has become harder by each day, and it does not only demand that candidates have good grades at school or high IQ in general but also requires the potential employees to be of social competence. I can well remember one of my friends Jack when he went to Shenzhen the big city looking for a well-paid job. Tough as it was for Jack, he tried every way to find an opportunity that could get him in the brand-name company he wanted and he did not give up. Later, Jack came across one of the managers of the company in a recruitment affair and jack presented him his exquisite eloquence even though jack did not know who was the manager working for. For jack had shown his upward-mobility and himself as a real eager-beaver, the manager grew to like him and with whom eventually became acquaintance. In the end, Jack was offered a chance of an interview and got a position in the company as he wished. What I can learn from his experience is that networking is more crucial than simply studying hard, for that knowledge such as those of physics or biology are not likely to help you get to your dream job any closer, and that to achieve success in one’s career demands that social acceptability which consists of various qualities but the most fundamental one, the ability to relate well with others.
Finally, relating to others well can in turn help your study. Although some may claim that in an ever-increasingly competitive world like this, it is essential to possess the mentality of continuing-studying, rather than simply making friends who end up being not quite really helpful with your self-improvement. The fallacy of that claim is the opponents ignore that one can always make friends with those who excel in their works or at school; having a good relationship with those who put efforts and their hearts into learning can actually help you realize the importance of study as well. Also, the so-called Feynman Technique, an approach that you can learn an abstract concept or a difficult skill through explaining it to your friends, indicates that studying not only demands one’s full heart in reading and writing but also requires strong interaction and fundamental communicative skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-18 | fringe7920383351@163.com | 87 | view |
| 2020-06-13 | 地狱博士后 | 70 | view |
| 2019-07-07 | tjehdaud12 | 68 | view |
| 2019-02-11 | quanjun | 90 | view |
| 2019-02-11 | quanjun | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 320, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...d by means of making friends with those who are, from them you can actually learn many ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 900, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n and fundamental communicative skills.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, look, may, really, so, well, as for, in addition, in general, such as, as well as, in my opinion, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 29.0 11.0286738351 263% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3001.0 1977.66487455 152% => OK
No of words: 619.0 407.700716846 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84814216478 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98795655647 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84244094218 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 303.0 212.727598566 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489499192246 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 927.0 618.680645161 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.2039471337 48.9658058833 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.947368421 100.406767564 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5789473684 20.6045352989 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42105263158 5.45110844103 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219583428653 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0846724085607 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115767384551 0.0737576698707 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155503642408 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118181425879 0.0645574589148 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.