Urban planning and cities expansion is a hot trend in recent years and with this development an issue has been raised which provide the comparison between keeping old historical buildings with replacing them with new places. I agree with the statement that says we should preserve old constructions and I explain my view in following reasons.
First of all, the structures belong to past era of human being are symbol of history which include many stories that could teach many things to people. Archaeologists believe demolishing these fantastic masterpieces of our ancestors is equal to removing our identity and this has negative effect on children and future generations. For example an old building which has referred to one hundred years ago reminds to a young boy how his city is noble and how persons in that time were civilized and this makes him try to be a good person.
Secondly, diversity is a vital factor on spirit and mood of people and city planners and managers have focused on this technique of municipal management. Psychologists insist modernity is the most powerful enemy of variety because all subjects in a city inclined to be in determined style. For instance this is undeniable that skyscrapers in fashioned big cities are similar to each other and follow a unique format of construction and just different creative homes which have remained from many years ago may cease this homogenization.
In final words, tourists come to visit a city to see different history and culture which found in mansions and buildings of past times. Replacing them with modern towers resulted in reducing interest of a tourist to travel a city and this means revenue loss for the city. For example Cairo capital of Egypt is famous for travelers because presents culture of a country in two thousand years old region with architect mode of its structures and removing these valuable source of money generation is not a good decision.
In conclusion, we know technology force all nations to be updated even in building of their homes but they should resist with this unwanted result of industrialization by keeping their precious properties and try to make new objects in another area of their cities.
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 67
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 60
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide.What is the cause of this?What measures can the international community take to make sure the supply of food is enough? 89
- TPO-23 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons an 78
- living in alarge city or a small town. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ars ago may cease this homogenization. In final words, tourists come to visit a...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03260869565 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7779714672 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592391304348 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.9908324929 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.333333333 100.406767564 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 20.6045352989 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 5.45110844103 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2394102242 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820666298119 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686862604639 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131169907485 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810808693715 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
automated_readability_index: 17.6 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 58.1214874552 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.