Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should they spend more money on improving public transortation(buses, trains, subways)? Ehy? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.
Some people want that the government spend a lot of money on upgrading roads and highways. However, in my opinion, the government should invest more money on improving public transportations due to decreasing the air pollution and removing people’s stress.
To begin with, it is more beneficial for the government to invest a lot of money on public transportations since it is important to protect the air by people decreasing using their cars. The air has been polluted by automobile exhaust. Also, the global warming and a lot of pollutions by people have influenced the environment. For instance, the South Korea has a major problem these days, which is about the fine dust. So, the government tried cleaning the air by upgrading the transportations to reduce using cars. They decorate a lot of buses with some animation characters and discount the costs. Then, people begin to take buses, as a result the air become fresh. This shows that improving the public transportations is important for the environment, so the government should invest more money on doing it.
On top of that, the government should use more money to reform the transportations due to improving the quality of life. Every morning, there is always a lot of cars on streets and heavy traffic jams. Also, a lot of people are in subways and buses to go to work with sweating and being tired and they will be exhausted when they arrive their workplace. So, it is important to improve the transportations like increasing the number of subways and buses by investing a lot of money on them. For example, there is a study done by the New York Times. It reveals that the people who commute in their own car or the transportations prefer increasing the number of some transportations to keeping the system of traffic. When the government tried operating more buses and trains, people said that they weren’t exhausted when they went to work and had less stress. To sum up, the government had better invest more money on upgrading the traffics for protecting the environment and the quality of life. I firmly believe that it is more advantageous to spend a lot of money on the public transportations.
- The news media is a reliable source of unbiased information 38
- The most efficient way for a country to progress is to improve its schools 35
- Universities should spend as much money on sports as they do on libraries 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for young people to select a job in the same field as their parents than to choose a different career for themselves 80
- In order to encourage children to study harder, parents should avoid letting them watch television. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of money on the public transportations.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, for example, for instance, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8972972973 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00136443284 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440540540541 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.0 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2498213557 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3684210526 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4736842105 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305806088961 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103166995817 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103124797067 0.0737576698707 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252609966117 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631080791912 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.