Only in the last few decades in the long history of humankind, has technology developed exponentially. Smartphones and internet have become ubiquitous, with more that 90 percent of the earth having access to them. As the encroachment of smartphones over our lives grows, some parents feel that young kids should not be allowed to have exposure to phones as it may negatively affect them. Others disagree, stating phones are important to stay in touch. Excessive phone usage may indeed be harmful, but forbiding young kids from using phones is definitely not the right measure.
Smart phones are useful and essential even, for a variety of reasons. Apart from the vast amount of knowlegle, ease of use, and access to almost anything possible via the internet, smartphones have powerful features that can enable parents to stay in touch with their kids. Parents that have to work away from the kids, can catch up with them over video-call. By using instant messaging small messages can be delivered to the kids such as to remind them about the forgotten lunch box in their bag. Then there are many applications that can share the location of the user remotely. Parents could monitor it and stay aware about the whereabouts of their kids at all times; thus, providing the parents a sense of assurance that their young ones are safe.
On the contrary, when something is forbidden, its appeal increases even more. If kids are not allowed to use smartphones, they will find other ways to access them. They could borrow it from friends or even retort to stealing. Without access to phones, the kids will not be able to reach their parents incase some emergency arises. Some will argue that there have been contless generations that made it throught without cellphones, however, as of now, it does seem the need of the hour. Only precaution that would have to be taken is to prevent kids from excessive usage of cellphones, as that could make them too dependent on it, or addicted.
In conclusion, parents should definitely allow young children to own smartphones, but at the same time, the use of these powerful gadgets should only be moderately allowed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, then, thus, apart from, as to, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92582417582 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55640836035 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549450549451 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0455185434 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6111111111 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21296524226 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715215030527 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583316462244 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128550547452 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545395270393 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 11.7677419355 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.