Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed by humans activity. Others feel that humans activity makes the Earth a better place to live.
The earth is the only planet where the life exists. Some believe that humans had made the earth the perfect place to live rather than damaged or harmed. this essay will discuss why it is in fact that people have harmed the earth rather than made it a better place to live.
Contrary to the belief that humans made the earth a suitable place to live , evidence shows that people actually have harmed our planet by changing the delicate balance of our ecosystem. For example, According to a recent study from the University of Texas has revealed that the recreational hunting is one of the activities that has drastically changed the ecosystem’s balance. So, by having avoided this activity, it would help the improvement of our environment.
Secondly, people all over the world are never satisfied with their achievements. they always look forward for new innovations which would help them to increase their profits. Most of the time, they do not think about the consequences or problems that these innovations may cause. For instance, with the development of the industrial revolution, people’s lives are changed for the better. However, people never looked at the consequences of air pollution that got released from these huge machineries. Because of the toxins and the high level of air pollution in the atmosphere, people’s health had deteriorated. this supports the idea that people had developed things without thinking deeply or analysing the issues that come with that. Therefore, the people’s negative influence to the earth has increased by causing a lot of damage to our planet.
In conclusion, In my view, people have really harmed the earth by participating in different activities, and by innovating things without considering the issues that come's with it. people have caused a negative impact in the planet earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... to live rather than damaged or harmed. this essay will discuss why it is in fact th...
^^^^
Line 11, column 75, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... made the earth a suitable place to live , evidence shows that people actually hav...
^^
Line 15, column 82, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ever satisfied with their achievements. they always look forward for new innovations...
^^^^
Line 15, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... forward for new innovations which would help them to increase their profits. Mos...
^^
Line 15, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... better. However, people never looked at the consequences of air pollution that g...
^^
Line 15, column 625, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... people's health had deteriorated. this supports the idea that people had devel...
^^^^
Line 15, column 787, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t. Therefore, the people's negative influence to the earth has increased by...
^^
Line 15, column 825, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve influence to the earth has increased by causing a lot of damage to our planet...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, look, may, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 300.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27333333333 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86658795776 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5103671145 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.875 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.45110844103 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30159148862 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972261755791 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935588255052 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20127472632 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102378610338 0.0645574589148 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.