As the population continues to skyrocket, resources like clean water and land will definitely become increasingly valuable. Some people suggest that since human needs are important, we should prioritize land for agriculture, industry, or housing. However, I believe that conserving land for endangered animals should be valued.
First, from an environmental standpoint, the process of animals going extinct is irreversible. It is essential that people take measures to prevent endangered creatures from taking further damage. Saving land for endangered animals not only help them live and breed naturally, but let them maintain their lifestyle away from human damage. If we want to protect the environment for the animals and the future generation, we must take action to save land.
Furthermore, developing natural land for agricultural or industrial purposes ruins the purposes of the land, such as absorbing water and conserving soil. Without the vegetation, causing desertification or landslides. For example, in my country, Taiwan, mountain lands are developed to cultivate produce from a colder climate. However, this affects the land's ability to conserve soil. As a result, whenever heavy storms and rain hits, mudslides completely destroy the landscape and are deadly to the locals. Protecting land also means protecting us. Therefore, we should think twice before developing the land.
In addition, although people keep exploiting undeveloped lands, there will never be sufficient space for everyone. What we should do is utilize the areas which are already developed resourcefully, rather than blindly developing lands vital to the Earth we all live on. If one wants to develop natural lands, their plans and ideas should be reviewed carefully by the government. We should create a balance between protecting the environment and human needs. It is only with this goal can we save resources for future generations.
Human needs to use land should not completely overshadow saving lands for animals. In protecting land, we are not only protecting endangered animals, but also us and future generations. In conclusion, developing land for human purposes is not more important than conserving land.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lands'' or 'land's'?
Suggestion: lands'; land's
...lder climate. However, this affects the lands ability to conserve soil. As a result, ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 337.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55489614243 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94051956927 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560830860534 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0067829797 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0909090909 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3181818182 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31802210311 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099108009322 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813380361579 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197509045514 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567663405544 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.