Some students prefer classes with open discussions between theprofessor and students and almost no lectures. Other students preferclasses with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

There are many types of learning patterns, which are student develops. In my opinion, discussion with lecture is the most crucial part which a student can adapt in order to understand the concepts and structure of the subject. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, Lecturer have good amount of knowledge which they can share amongst their students for their better understanding. They have good command over the subject so they are the good hub for learning more about certain topic. I think, students should always go through specific module and discussed the same with their professor to learn best from their point of view. For Example, I was not good in Computing subject in my academics , so I always used to discuss my understanding with the professor, so I can get less difficulties in the subject this has always help me a lot to overcome difficulties in my subject.
Secondly, they are well aware about the important tips and tricks for the subject which eventually are most beneficially for a student to crack their exams. For Instance, when I was in my last year my professor used to mention certain important topic which you should always learn. She used to provide some sort of template for the paper presentation, which has always helped students to complete the task very soon without taking more time along, with that it has helped us to understand properly.
In conclusion, I believe that student should always have discussed with their professor because, it not only strengthened the teacher student relationship, but also seems to be more efficient from student end to understand the concept as per the teachers’ perspective.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ood in Computing subject in my academics , so I always used to discuss my underst...
^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Computing subject in my academics , so I always used to discuss my understanding ...
^^
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun difficulties is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...anding with the professor, so I can get less difficulties in the subject this has al...
^^^^
Line 3, column 572, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'helped'.
Suggestion: helped
...iculties in the subject this has always help me a lot to overcome difficulties in my...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, sort of, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 287.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96515679443 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75430840603 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536585365854 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.3180349799 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.545454545 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1818181818 5.45110844103 242% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203863431568 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958065030981 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570676024501 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1507078479 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252733887415 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.