Sometimes filmmakers make movies that are based on books. When a movie is based on a book, some people prefer to read the book before watching the movie. Other people prefer to read the book only after they have watched the movie. Which do you prefer and why?
Throughout the course of film history, successful producers and directors have utilized various methods and ideas to make their movies more fascinating and interesting. A majority of them firmly believe that movies based on popular books can catch people’s attention further. Among audiences, there is a controversial issue whether it is better to watch the movie before reading book or not. I, to a great extent, hold the viewpoint that reading the book based on which the film is made bring about some advantages. In the following paragraphs, the most outstanding ones are substantiated in detail.
To commence with, with the advent of the state-of-the-art technology film industry has undergone a noticeable change which made it more impressive. These changes contribute to creating a close relation with audience, and nowadays films are more interesting for human beings in comparison to books. As a result, reading a book, the person gets informed with the main story and happenings during the movie, and consequently, it will be less exciting for the viewer when he watches it on the TV, on the grounds that the movie has nothing novel for the viewer. To shed more light on this matter, horror movies are generally frightening due to unexpected events occurring suddenly and surprise the viewer. Therefore, if the one has already known those occurrences, which are supposed to be unpredictable, he does not enjoy the film as much as possible. For this reason, reading book should be done after watching movie.
The second exquisite point to be mentioned is that during seeing a movie either at home or in cinema, a plethora of people miss some parts of it since it is most probably that they get distracted by diverse things. Therefore, it is plausible that reading the related book can help them to understand some significant, missing parts. In other words, they possess the chance to review the movie and its happenings once more after a while in order to have a profound understanding about major points in the movie. As a tangable example, take a situation into account in which a father and his family are watching a movie producing based on a published book. During the time when they are watching movie while his children are playing, he most likely cannot view several parts of it. Instead of playing the film again, he is able to purchase the book and review the several portions of it to get the gist and main purpose of author and producer.
To sum up, considering the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that reading book after watching movie is more advantageous. Not only is the film more attracting for audience, but it also brings the opportunity to perceive critical and important scenes which may have been missed beforehand.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which may have been missed beforehand.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, as to, as a result, in other words, to sum up, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2320.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81987159856 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543103448276 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.104605258 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.105263158 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4210526316 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370347490051 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113720974932 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816367550348 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229308966218 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657758309539 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.