Short, tall, funny, smart, nice... you name it. There are all kinds of people in the world. Each person has his or her own unique character and abilities. Being able to understand your friend's different characteristics and treating all friends equally is recommended, people have different thoughts about various types of friends. When it comes to choosing to spend time with between two types of friends -smart or funny- I would definitely choose to spend time with humorous friends.
To begin with, I could understand and communicate with humorous friends more compared to intelligent friends. It is true that you could learn many things from intelligent friends, but if the intellectual level between two people are significantly different, people may find it hard to understand each other deeply. In retrospect, I had a friend named John, who was a very smart student who was always the top of the class. However, I sometimes found it hard to understand his complicated speech using different words. Also, whenever we had a discussion on a topic during class, it was hard for me to understand and respond to his logic. Furthermore, with intelligent friends, it is easy for you to develop complex about his or her intelligence, especially when it comes to exam grades. Although this may not be desirable, people easily compare themselves with other people. Comparing yourself with smart friends may depress you. As a result, you may feel it is difficult to spend time with intellectual people. Therefore, for these reasons, my penchant is spending time with intellectual friends.
In addition, I am able to have long and pleasant conversations with humorous friends. Funny people, through their humor are able to prevent the conversation becoming too boring and give laughter and joy to other people. Although you may not benefit knowledge by spending time with intellectual friends, you are able to spend time joyfully with humorous friends. Also, they are able to cheer up friends who are depressed with their humor and make them feel better. For example, there is a friend of mine named George. He is a man of humor, and always makes jokes whenever I am down. As a result, I prefer to spend my time with George instead of John that I mentioned in the previous paragraph.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in addition, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99737532808 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78479298236 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514435695538 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8275719584 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7826086957 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5652173913 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26086956522 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323039589966 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948427764245 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886267585665 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239032950756 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385367334141 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.