Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that the university clubs do really valuable services for society. This special club also provides three great options to help society. However, I, to a great extent, believe that help students in a nearby primary school with reading or mathematics is the best decision for this university club.
First and foremost, all of the members of this club are students, therefore, they have very good skills in different courses that teaching into the primary school students. While most of them have not any experience in non-academic works. Involving students in the works that they have not enough information and ability on that is not a reasonable decision, because it can even create more problems for people who students want to assist them. For example, students should spend some training periods to prepare for this kind of tasks, like house building or relationship with old people. In addition, students have not very free time for this kind of training because they should study for their courses at the university. However, helping primary school students has a lower difficulty and is more practical than two other options.
Another significant fact that should be taken into consideration is that children's success in education maybe is the most important thing that can influence the future of each society. If children could be successful in the study it means that we would have more happy adult people in the future, more developed country and better living condition for all people in society.
Finally, yet importantly, university students are the best person for assisting young children. Because they are familiar with children concerns and needs because they have some similar experience during their study in school. For example, my mother's friend has a son that he has very difficulty with mathematics and he never obtains a good grade in this course. I suggested help him to prepare for one of his important exams, when I was watching his practics I found out that his most weakness is the lack in self-confidence, I spoke with him about my own experience in school and how I had the same problem and how I could overcome to this problem. It led to he became more sure about his ability and talent, the end he achieved a very better result in his exam.
On the basis of reasons that mentioned above, I am convinced that help students in a nearby primary school with reading or mathematics is the best choices for these students in the university club. Because university students already have more knowledge and skills to teach school students than participate in other not relevant works. In addition, students success in education is the most important needs in each society and the university students are the best person for this assistance because they have a lot of similar experience with young children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...niversity club. First and foremost, all of the members of this club are students, ther...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ching into the primary school students. While most of them have not any experience in...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, really, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, kind of, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2401.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 478.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0230125523 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63185653595 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458158995816 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 746.1 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.238316842 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.368421053 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1578947368 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42105263158 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27848429893 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101803883633 0.076458572812 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927079803979 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176279598637 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094865299 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.