The reading states that there are several reasons that the project of sending humans to Mars requires solving many problems. On the other hand, the lecturer finds all the reasons mentioned by the reading dubious and refutes them all by specific details.
First, the reading states that the journey to Mars is long and that it is not easy to bring in sufficient sources of food, water, and oxygen. On the contrary, the lecturer mentions the fact that Spaceships can use the hydroponic technique, in which plants can grow with minimal energy and minerals, also, with the hydroponic method, it can turn dirty water into clean water and drink this water easily.
Furthermore, the author argues that astronauts on the Mars mission would be in the zero-gravity environment of space for many months at a time, and in this situation, the zero-gravity environment has a negative effect on the human body. Conversely, the professor states that there are several techniques that astronauts can use such as regular exercise, and use vitamins.
Finally, the reading states that astronauts on a mission to Mars would be exposed to dangerous levels of space radiation, such as solar radiation. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that solar radiation is not at a dangerous level all the time, and a small shield can protect them from space radiation. On the other hand, it is not necessary to put on a shield all the time, so shield weight can not be a problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, if, so, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 1977.66487455 62% => OK
No of words: 252.0 407.700716846 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85714285714 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6041785714 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 212.727598566 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488095238095 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 375.3 618.680645161 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.7370865429 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 100.406767564 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 5.45110844103 226% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101673216729 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490258765525 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407788370096 0.0737576698707 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0674828564427 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423699283059 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.