Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often considered as a bad quality for a person. However, some people think that it is a good quality for a person.
Undoubtedly, making a quick decision may be very beneficial since people seems to win more time to accomplish their assignments. However, they will allocate more time to restarting the task if they tackle the problem in a wrong direction. Therefore, I could hardly agree more with the statement that allocating sufficient time to making a crucial decision is a precious quality for a person, reasons of which will be illustrated as follows.
Initially, spending a lot of time to figure out the resolution of a problem is conducive to my academic learning. For one thing, it will bring about a higher study efficiency. When I allocate enough time to making decisions, several potential mistakes and errors will come into my mind in advance and I could envision tactics to handle with them. Thus, a more comprehensive resolution of obstacles I will figure out before I start to do the task. As a result, saving more time during the process of accomplishing the assignment, I will obtain a higher study efficiency. For another, it will enhance my study effectiveness. To take a lot of time to make a decision enable me to make a more insightful consideration concerning different aspects of research domains to decide the direction of my term paper. It is conceivable that an extraordinary paper attributes to writer’s deep insight of the theme. Thanks to theses insightful envisions, I could always get a higher mark of my term paper. Thus, only with taking enough time to make decisions, can I obtain merits of academic learning.
In addition, being willing to take more time to make a decision is conducive to work. To state it more clearly, allocating more time to make a plan of my assignment and then making my own option of work decision, I could figure out a more suitable and valuable solution. A case in point is Leonardo Da Vince, one of the most prestigious painters during the era of Renaissance. When his mentor assigned him with a drawing task, he always took a lot of time to make a decision of his painting like making a draft, trying diversified colors and even travel to different places to decide what to paint. Eventually, thanks to his cautious and carefully attitude toward his decision of work, he created his unprecedented masterpiece “the last supper”. On the contrary, if Da Vinci tend to make quick decisions of his paintings, a less suitable and fabulous draw he would paint. Thus, we may lose the opportunity to appreciate such masterpieces. Accordingly, but for the help of taking sufficient time to make decisions, we would not have accomplished our work successfully.
In a nutshell, based on my own experiences and social demands, I tend to believe that taking enough time to make an essential decision is of great importance for a person.
- Your job has more effect on your happiness than your social life does 85
- People should know events happening around the world even if they have little influence on their daily lives 87
- Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often considered as a bad quality for a person However some people think that it is a good quality for a person 73
- You have long been friend with someone If they do something that you don t like should you still be friends with him or her 70
- People should know events happening around the world even if they have little influence on their daily lives 87
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f which will be illustrated as follows. Initially, spending a lot of time to fig...
^^^
Line 2, column 852, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'attribute'?
Suggestion: attribute
...conceivable that an extraordinary paper attributes to writer’s deep insight of the theme. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, in addition, as a result, for one thing, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2310.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89406779661 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99323845417 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487288135593 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 750.6 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4091591591 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.40909090909 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249967847919 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766248546144 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725758911884 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188035512412 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600225710122 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f which will be illustrated as follows. Initially, spending a lot of time to fig...
^^^
Line 2, column 852, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'attribute'?
Suggestion: attribute
...conceivable that an extraordinary paper attributes to writer’s deep insight of the theme. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, in addition, as a result, for one thing, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2310.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89406779661 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99323845417 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487288135593 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 750.6 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4091591591 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.40909090909 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249967847919 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766248546144 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725758911884 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188035512412 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600225710122 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.