A teacher's ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught.
A talented teacher is talented in everything. However, if I would need to choose between good interaction with a teacher and a teacher with perfect knowledge of a subject, my choice would be to study with a teacher, who is professional in his field for two compelling reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, the obvious reason why we are going to universities or schools is getting knowledges in a certain field, therefore if a student is truly interested in a subject, he or she would find the way to communicate with a teacher and get competent answers to questions that might arise. For instance, during my course, I met a professor, who came to the lecture only to answer the questions, he never talked on his own, that is why my group was highly motivated to find out some interesting topics and to prepare noticable issues to discus. Although, at the being of our study we were disappointed, because the professor said during almost the month: ”if there are no questions we are all going home”. This case is a good illustration of how students get even more profit from uncommunicable professor.
In the same manner, an inefficient teacher could take all attention and talk about interesting things, which is useless or even worth. Firstly, that kind of study, in general, steal our time an, secondly, lead to nasty consequences. For example, at my university, I graduated from an architecture faculty, some of tutors just skipped engineering part of projects, motivating like students did not really need this stuff, and focused on a design and beautiful pictures more than on constructions. It played a bad joke on my future career. When I came to my first employer, I spend a lot of time on tasks, which he gave me, because real projects was all about sustainable, reliable construction with basic design. I still feel sorry, that during my study I was careless about knowledge, what I got from inefficient teachers. Later I spend not a single night with books from university library getting important knowledges, what my profession requires.
To sum it um, I claim with confidence that teachers ability to relate well with students is secondary to excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. This is because students come to university to become good specialists and get excellent knowledge in a field of future profession.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
...professor said during almost the month: ”if there are no questions we are all goi...
^
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: NO_SPACE_CLOSING_QUOTE[1]
Message: There should be a space after a closing quote.
Suggestion: ” if
...professor said during almost the month: ”if there are no questions we are all going...
^^^
Line 3, column 706, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
...e are no questions we are all going home”. This case is a good illustration of ho...
^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'an'?
...nd of study, in general, steal our time an, secondly, lead to nasty consequences. F...
^^^
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the tutors') or simply say ''some tutors''.
Suggestion: some of the tutors; some tutors
...graduated from an architecture faculty, some of tutors just skipped engineering part of projec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 44, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...sum it um, I claim with confidence that teachers ability to relate well with students is...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in general, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92786069652 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93580504523 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562189054726 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.4316616264 48.9658058833 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.066666667 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 5.45110844103 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319956951104 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984148472421 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146662810618 0.0737576698707 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228961406237 0.150856017488 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160749021421 0.0645574589148 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.