In the current emerging world, communication between the people has been increased every day and people more relay on each other. The friendship is paying a vital role in communication between the people. In other words, friendship is the god’s gift to the society to built the better relationship between people. Some believe it is important to hold old friend and others not. In my view, I feel an old friend should get a priority, compare to creating new friends because they are very supportive and more trust.
First and foremost, an old friend is more supportive compared to the new friend. When we have a new friend, they don’t know how to treat us because they couldn’t know anything about my behavior and it will take a time to familiar with each other. However, if the friend is close and old, they become a family after the certain period. As a result, we share everything as a household. For example, when I was studying Pharmacy at Texas state university, my family arranged my sister wedding. Since I am having the final exams, I requested my close friend Princy to take care of the function. She was really helped me a lot and fulfilled my duties. All this only possible because she knew me since I was in high school.
Second, if the friend is very close, we have more trust in each other. The honesty is the key to building a strong friendship and it is only possible with trust. When we make a new friend, initially, both don’t know anything about each other as a result they hide their feelings because of the lack of trust between them. In contrast, if I have a close and old best friend, I am having full trust on him and I feel very comfortable to share all my personals because he is very familiar with my thoughts and ideas and I also do same as well. For an instant, when I was studying for my Master's Degree, I almost stayed for one year at my friend house. Most of the time I stay alone because as a part of the business he travel's a lot. In view of the fact that, he is having the trust in me that's why he allowed me to stay alone in his home and I stand for that.
In conclusion, holding old friend always built trust and care and support.
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 85
- TPO-17 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better then they really are.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 66
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 73
- TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 791, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...fact that, he is having the trust in me thats why he allowed me to stay alone in his ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, really, second, so, well, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41728395062 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48898686854 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474074074074 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8567907239 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1904761905 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125105165098 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457221725703 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053324607724 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939147677401 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142026936434 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.8 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.