Human behavior has attracted much social concern. Some sociologists believe that successful people tend to try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Personally, I bear in mind a strong agreement with this belief.
On the one hand, what has been put under consideration is personal development. The fact is that trying new things creates chances for people to be exposed to varied circumstances. Therefore, it is possible for them to obtain a more thorough reflection of themselves through their own failures and successes. As a result, people tend to be aware of their strengths and weaknesses to fill the gaps in their abilities. Consequently, this promotes people to perfect themselves and become more competent. More importantly, it cannot be denied that taking risks doing new things possesses a huge opportunity for people to attain realistic experiences on a large range of matters in their lives. It leads to the fact that there is a likelihood for them to widen their horizons and be capable of the answers for the questions about themselves such as what duties they have, what they want, who they are, etc. On that ground, needless to say, people are bound to active their potential abilities and gradually become more proficient. By and large, always trying new things and taking risks are characteristics of successful people.
On the other hand, some people might say that always trying new things results in extremely bad decisions in a career. Accordingly, it is too unreasonable for successful people to have this way of thinking. However, it is just applicable to a minority. It is widely known that with careful consideration of the relative factors, good decisions can be made. It follows that people are able to both try new things and have thorough thinking to put everything under control. Furthermore, taking risks to try new things stands a golden chance for people to acquire a strong attitude and a flexible way of thinking. In this case, it is expected to encourage people to remove the boredom in working and obtain a creative brain. Correspondingly, it is apparent that they are highly likely to be in their best condition at every time and possibly generate great ideas in working. This, in turn, forms a significant contribution to enhancing their working performance and raising the success in their career. Beyond any doubt, the idea that trying new things is too harmful to be used by successful people is often possible to end in collapse.
In a word, all factors mentioned above are evidence supporting my agreement. It is highly recommended that everyone should take my writing into careful consideration to make an appropriate decision on choosing a living attitude.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, such as, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2300.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 457.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03282275711 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87941376989 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514223194748 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8216854849 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8333333333 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0416666667 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281396674642 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775146172805 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101780602958 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188975855961 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116650039386 0.0645574589148 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.