As suggested in the definition of success, achieving a profound result with correct and proper decisions. Expectedly, a controversial question arises among minds whether successful people should try new things and take risks or do what they know how to do well. From my perspective, although taking risks may bring success, thanks to luck, I believe that doing what I know is the best way to take decisions.
The first and important reason is its time importance. Many acquired skills earlier help us to stand up concrete toward an approach. Since the profession is developing over time by experiencing the challenging and facing problems, learning new approaches require to spend valuable time on the subject. Moreover, the adaptation process is even harder for virtually everybody. For example, one of my friends had decided to change his department at the university, and transferred to a totally different department, from mechanical engineering to molecular biology and genetics. Even though he is interested and successful in the new department, he threw away 3 years from his youth, indeed, he might be successful in the previous department as well.
Subsequent and a related reason why people should follow what they know how to do well is its practical manner, meaning the quick response from the work have been done for. CEOs of companies generally not taking risks and do innovation to protect their steady stage of profits. Although there are a few examples of successful CEOs in history, such as Steve Jobs who is the crazy head of Apple Company, generally, taking risky decision fails the company and lead to lost all of their customers even. Moreover, in a short time, companies can benefit from not changing the way they follow, and they can make a profit.
In conclusion, some people may find my arguments above rational, but I follow my way. Indeed, taking risk will bring success, but it requires luck certainly. Otherwise, most of the risks will result in fails. Besides, learning and try new things takes noticable time. Therefore, it is best not to take risk and follow previous approach.
- TPO 07 90
- TPO 14- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TOEFL T P O 1 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO 20 – task 2: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO
Message: Did you mean 'spending'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
...oblems, learning new approaches require to spend valuable time on the subject. Moreover,...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07449856734 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77908603404 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590257879656 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.533469637 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3888888889 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3888888889 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328021609017 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963491618167 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112228981081 0.0737576698707 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212151091215 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134117288867 0.0645574589148 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.