Even though some people prefer to do their tasks quickly without paying attention to their possible mistakes, I believe because of following reasons people must work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
To begin with, if employees do their jobs so fast, but do not eliminate their mistakes, it would lead to the lose of boss prospective of them. In other sense, since employee have not pay attention to their tasks, their task would contain tremendous problems, and their boss would return their taks to them in order to do tasks again and solve the problems, and besides that, after a while the boss would think lower of the employee and change his mind that the employee is not as good as he has thought before. So, the boss wont trust that employee any more. As a consequence, if the boss wants to fire some one, the first one that comes to boss's mind would be that employee.
In addition, in such a competed markets even a simple mistake would hurt any companies. There are enormous alternative companies in the world that are fighting over the winnig the international markets, and if one of them makes a mistake, the other one would soon takes its palce. To illustrate this, recently the Sumsung company, which produces electronic devices such as smart phones, has lost tremendous shares because the S7 versions of its smart phones fired several times on planes due to their damaged batteries. Suddenly, every one wants to return their phones and the company losts a great deal of money.
Last but not the least, a person in order to detect and debug its problems must spend much more time. Since the source of a problem is not clear after we made them, it takes significantly time to find and solve them. Also, we may need to redo the tasks for repair and solve our previous mistakes.
To sum up, because of mentioned reasons, I am of the conviction that we must avoid mistakes before making them.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.Use specific reasons and examples to 70
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 10
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 67
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...minate their mistakes, it would lead to the lose of boss prospective of them. In other s...
Line 3, column 605, Rule ID: ANY_BODY
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
... consequence, if the boss wants to fire some one, the first one that comes to bosss mind...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, so, while, in addition, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 339.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69321533923 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35463650057 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566371681416 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.1191488131 48.9658058833 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.384615385 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0769230769 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120990768782 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434956502124 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620264899196 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838991626934 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812294979948 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 10.002688172 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
for repair and solve our previous mistakes.
to repair and solve our previous mistakes.
for repairing and solving our previous mistakes.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 339 350
No. of Characters: 1539 1500
No. of Different Words: 179 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.291 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.54 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.273 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 89 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 65 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 42 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.077 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.21 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.769 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.34 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.634 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.202 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5