No doubt this era is technologically advanced and is advancing more and more in the field of art, technology, science and various other fields. With the changing of this world, people and their lifestyle of people is also changing drastically and, this change is a curse or a boon for humans is often debated. To my opinion, this change in the world had made people less happy and less satisfied with their lives today than people in the past. Among plentitude of reason few are highlighted in the passage below.
First and foremost, emerging new trends and technology enforce people to keep update with them. In order to know how, what and why in the society people need to be keep themselves up to date with current technologies, so as to pace with them. For example, it is difficult for a person to be part of advaced society, who is devoid of computer knowledge and, as a result cannot jell along with people. However, person in the past did not require knowledge of such things to be a part of social gathering.
Secondly, with increasing demands of skills for such advancements need person to compete it's own class to live a wealthy and a happy life. For instance, students study for more than 12 hours today in order to stand out of the crowd,s ometimes have to sacrifice other interests of their own just to score well in academics. Professionals to have to study in order to fuldill demands of evolving trends and technologies and to earn a good life. Consequently, people are never satisfied with their life and work because competancy will never end. Unlike past days when people did not have much to compete yet they were happy.
In a nutshell, to sum up the assertions I will restate that people in this busy schedule have no time for themselves to be happy and this competition or urge to perform better than the crowd will persistanly insist on living such life and may be even for years to come.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...s up to date with current technologies, so as to pace with them. For example, it is diff...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , s
...today in order to stand out of the crowd,s ometimes have to sacrifice other intere...
^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'performing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'urge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: performing
...o be happy and this competition or urge to perform better than the crowd will persistanly ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, no doubt, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63343108504 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57438256372 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533724340176 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0664376751 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.857142857 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 5.45110844103 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263397740167 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961759425089 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105983862745 0.0737576698707 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154922196653 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862009272678 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.