Education is important part of our live. It defines our success in the future, that’s why it is so important to learn more effectively during school or university. Some people think that learning is more effective when you do your work alone rather than do your work in team; others disagree. Even though when you do you project alone you became more independent, in my view, work in team is better for two important reasons.
The main reason is that during assignment you will not only make your project but also you will improve your communication skill. This skill will help you in the future to solve a problem in a community. For example, last month my classmate I had to do chemistry lab about the reaction of acids with different components. During this experiment we had to talk, after all, we need to cooperate and solve problems to get a good mark. On the other hand, if I did experiment alone, I wouldn’t get such helpful experience. This skill helps me to solve a many different conflict situation. As you can see, work in team provides not only knowledge of the topic but also improves your communication with other people.
Another important reason is that your partner might help to understand the material better. When you do an assignment with another person you can obtain some extra information about your topic. For instance, in my school, I had to make a presentation about artificial intelligence with my friend. If I were alone, I wouldn’t be able to create good presentation because I was not familiar with this topic and had a very basic experience of doing a presentation. But my friend was interested in that topic and he had quite good skills making and presenting presentations. Without him, I wouldn't be able to do it. He not only helped me to get a good grade also he explained to me many different things in that field. As a result, I got an important information. This experience taught me that work in a team is better because you can get help or you can give help to somebody.
In the sum, work in team provides more efficient learning of the material. Not only because you develop and improve your communication skills but also because you can get help from your partner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...erience. This skill helps me to solve a many different conflict situation. As you can see, wor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 716, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s your communication with other people. Another important reason is that your pa...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...help to understand the material better. When you do an assignment with another perso...
^^^^
Line 5, column 591, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...resenting presentations. Without him, I wouldnt be able to do it. He not only helped me...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 683, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...et a good grade also he explained to me many different things in that field. As a result, I go...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 880, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... help or you can give help to somebody. In the sum, work in team provides more e...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, after all, for example, for instance, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71867007673 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79449423039 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462915601023 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1741130992 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8636363636 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7727272727 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177033021167 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575324549935 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742280808588 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132882990724 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827748014669 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.