Finishing a project effective is an inevitable ability for everyone. In such a modern life full of competition, time and tide wait for no man. Some people might be favor of working in group by stating that diversified solutions could be taken into account in comparison with working alone. However, personally speaking, working alone in projects is a more favorable way to improve efficiency, when I think about the following circumstances.
In the first place, time-consuming activities like finding the consensus among a group of people could be avoided when work alone. As we know, it's virtually impossible to have the same idea when we work together. At the most time, it costs extended time to meet everybody's thought. What's worse, this kind of problems occur not merely once during your work, it will emerge as soon as someone has a different idea. As a result, your group will spend plenty of time balancing the advantages or disadvantages between different ideas, which is of no value to making substantial progress. On the contrary, when work alone, you could only pay heed to the most crucial factors and save time to make profound research in those aspects.
Additionally, without reliance to others students will accomplish the assignment more active. In a group, people become free riders spontaneously when the intelligent have already made a plan. Even worse, there is somebody who reluctantly gives up his own idea and follow the majority of the group. It happens. Consequently, the projects are always finished by certain students of a group, even though they have indeed divided the jobs clearly. In this context, a remarkable decrease of efficiency comes up due to a lack of reliable cooperation. In contrast, when working alone, you have no alternative except putting up with all the jobs by your own, which stimulate you to work as fast as possible. Meanwhile, this project belongs to your personal achievement rather than a result of a group, hence you would make more effort in a bid to achieve excellent outcome. In this case, you will reap huge fruits in the wake of solving all the problems independently, and every step you overcome encourages you move faster and more effective.
Admittedly, sometimes it helps when students do projects together. Conceivable advantages exist. Such as new ideas sparked off by brainstorming, more solutions of problems and sophisticated social skills learned from this process. Nevertheless, it's more like a rewarding experiences rather than an effective method of learning.
Taken all those considerations into account, I take the attitude that the students learn much more effectively when they are asked to work alone. It could not only improve their ability of solving problems alone, but also help them find their own way more quickly. And finally, incredible efficiency.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...tended time to meet everybodys thought. Whats worse, this kind of problems occur not ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'substantial progress'.
Suggestion: substantial progress
...t ideas, which is of no value to making a substantial progress. On the contrary, when work alone, you ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 698, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'profound research'.
Suggestion: profound research
...t crucial factors and save time to make a profound research in those factors. Additionally, with...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'experience'?
Suggestion: experience
...Nevertheless, its more like a rewarding experiences rather than an effective method of lear...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, while, i think, in contrast, kind of, as a result, on the contrary, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2348.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1718061674 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89292507781 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566079295154 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.994623655914 302% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3871608595 48.9658058833 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.80952381 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.619047619 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.80952380952 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310508331982 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915816749448 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704817372038 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179246348213 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519651983107 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.