I disagrees with the statement so I do not think there would be fewer cars in use 20 years later than there are today. The key is safe and fast to support my opinion.
First, the safe is our first priority for transport I think. There are new technology that make our idea possible such as electronic car and automatic driving car however it takes so much time to feasible in society. For example, the taxi service “Uber” is famous and popular in United States because many people need to move fast for job or family events so they do prefer to take a taxi than using train or subway. The more people need to take a ride, the more car would be needed. However, the company is having trouble to find a potential driver so they developed automatic driving car. Actually, the car drive by itself with their program therefore they do not need a driver. They tried few times in the driving way however they made car accident so I would say that it could not be possible to fulfill in our society.
Second, by the aspect of fast, people in my generation would rather take a train, subway and even bikes. Nowadays our inventing is succeeding for making our life easy for example, the subway in Tokyo coming every 5 minutes so even someone in rush, they do not need to take a taxi or drive themselves because usually subway is faster and safer. Moreover, there are many people do not have a driver license because they are afraid of driving. If you drive in his way, you have to follow the speed with other cars around you to avoid car accident. Usually you are supposed to drive at least 60 mile per hour in high way otherwise you would be hit by other car. Hence, young people prefer to take public transportation than driving a car.
All of consider, I would support that there would not be fewer cars in use next twenty year because young people appreciate public transportations and actually they use everyday more than driving cars.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'disagree'
Suggestion: disagree
I disagrees with the statement so I do not think th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...day. The key is safe and fast to support my opinion. First, the safe is our fi...
^^
Line 3, column 682, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...heir program therefore they do not need a actually driver. They tried few times i...
^
Line 3, column 682, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('actually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('driver') instead of another adjective.
...heir program therefore they do not need a actually driver. They tried few times in the driving wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'take'
Suggestion: take
...t, people in my generation would rather taking a train, subway and even bikes. Nowaday...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, at least, even so, for example, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54519774011 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37957926097 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3547971133 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5625 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196451024991 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07948916786 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088984694046 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18003193197 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895493401385 0.0645574589148 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.