Being successful in a job without any doubts play a critical role in choosing a career. In every society, no matter what we want to or where we are, we always try to decrease the risk of failure in career. Some people believe that in the past it was easier to identify what type of career would lead to success, other would disagree. In my view, I completely disagree with statement and believe nowadays it is more convenient for job's type success prediction. In the following paragraphs I will delve in the most conspicuous reasons and examples justifying my point of view.
First of all, in present time development of technology and its statistical analysis help people to justify career success. Technology with gathering dates from all around the world through web connection, has more case studies for prediction the process of a job in future and its achievement. For example, I majored in architecture. After I graduated from university I started to look for job opportunity. While I was confused, I tried to compare jobs positive and negative aspect via a helpful website. I finally could choose the best alternative and stared to work as an architect designer in an office. After years I feel satisfied with my job and its circumstance. It was impossible for me to select this career without help of that website information. This example clearly indicate nowadays choosing career become easier than past.
Secondly, the other reasons is that in modern era, government based on democracy and this democracy founded on satisfaction of society members. Hence, governments try to prepare a suitable situation in job finding and identify what type to do. For instance, in almost country there is an organization of job (or similar title) in every governments. Its duty is to justifying and examination of every available jobs in society. By the help of this organization young people could register in these organizations and being helped by receiving suitable suggestion for jobs and future in career. Conversely, in the past without existence of this organization people themselves should identify this duty which was harder.
To sum up, now days in comparison with past, It becomes more convenient to identify career success by help of statistics provided by technology and also job organizations in governments.
|2019-12-31||Abbas.ghaffari||76||Read full essay|
|2019-12-04||raniamekhaiel||70||Read full essay|
|2019-10-12||M.S 2019||73||Read full essay|
|2019-09-24||raniamekhaiel||70||Read full essay|
|2019-09-15||SeehtEntity||70||Read full essay|
- TPO 36 Independent For the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children five to ten years old than to spend money on universities59
- Should parents help their children with their assignments or let them do their assignments independently73
- TPO 52 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer77
- TPO 41-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.76
- TPO 45 Integrated Writing Task3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 591, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
...ggestion for jobs and future in career. Conversely in the past without existence of this o...
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: IT_VBZ
Message: Did you mean 'becomes'?
...p, now days in comparison with past, It become more convenient to identify career succ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, i feel, first of all, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 382.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09685863874 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95853330687 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528795811518 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4708529062 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7142857143 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1904761905 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254316692392 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766198974928 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708814001685 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168297470601 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783867642014 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.