In a company, every one has his own duties and obligations. Finalizing the work with imperfections and excellence would guarantee the workers' position and give him the opportunity to become better with a wider experience. I believe that workers would be more satisfied if they have several different types of tasks to do, rather than doing the same tasks over and over again.
First, the variety in tasks would reduce a killer factor in any job which is routine. The hardest issue that a worker may encounter would be the feeling of routine in his daily tasks. This may lead to the worker to become bored of his job. Thus, workers will start not to like to show up to work, and this would affect the company terribly. Whenever the members of any company would become low motivated, this will smash it down dreadfully. On the other hand, if a worker have a variety in tasks, then he would employ all his energy in finalizing his work list.
Moreover, assigning myriad tasks to workers would make them more creative. Variability in the job cause workers to squeeze every thought in their minds to be efficient and productive. Also, with increasing competition, different duties would galvanize workers to be the best in what they do. For example, if several workers do the same job, in order to be unique, a worker must involve all his efforts in job completion. This would save work, time and effort on the company as a whole, and would rise it to the peak.
Furthermore, when workers have different jobs to do, then they would have more opportunity to be promoted to a higher position. As a result, when a worker makes an advantageous job, he would craft new projects and substantiate his qualities. Thus, he would be noticed by his leaders. because of that, he will be a better person with an exceptional future.
As a conclusion, the variety in the tasks of the workers would dramatically increase the level of satisfaction in their job. This would definitely have a bright impact on the personal job experience and on the company as a whole entity.
The big issue of the essay is
The big issue of the essay is that it has a lot of auxiliary verbs, like: may, would, will
second, it has some duplicated content. Sentences are not developed efficiently. Look:
Unique words percentage: 0.486111111111 0.524837075471 93%
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...rs would be more satisfied if they have several different types of tasks to do, rather than doing...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: BORED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'bored with'?
Suggestion: bored with
.... This may lead to the worker to become bored of his job. Thus, workers will start not t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...us, he would be noticed by his leaders. because of that, he will be a better person wit...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their job. This would definitely have a bright impact on the personal job experi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1704.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73333333333 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64215587245 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486111111111 0.524837075471 93% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.304248877 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192908062258 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699669173713 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926895851805 0.0737576698707 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134891267069 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664037613242 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.